GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs RTX A4000 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A4000 Mobile with GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, including specs and performance data.

RTX A4000 Mobile
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
39.52

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms RTX A4000 Mobile by a whopping 109% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1126
Place by popularitynot in top-10082
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data48.91
Power efficiency23.7119.99
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA104AD103
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51208448
Core clock speed1140 MHz2340 MHz
Boost clock speed1680 MHz2610 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt285 Watt
Texture fill rate268.8689.0
Floating-point processing power17.2 TFLOPS44.1 TFLOPS
ROPs8096
TMUs160264
Tensor Cores160264
Ray Tracing Cores4066

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data310 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s672.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.68.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A4000 Mobile 39.52
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 82.59
+109%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A4000 Mobile 15197
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 31759
+109%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
−126%
226
+126%
1440p75−80
−109%
157
+109%
4K45−50
−113%
96
+113%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.54
1440pno data5.09
4Kno data8.32

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
−128%
189
+128%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−100%
170−180
+100%
Elden Ring 130−140
−136%
300−350
+136%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
−11.4%
110−120
+11.4%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
−128%
189
+128%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−100%
170−180
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−143%
467
+143%
Metro Exodus 90−95
−71.3%
160−170
+71.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
−101%
150−160
+101%
Valorant 150−160
−212%
450−500
+212%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
−11.4%
110−120
+11.4%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
−106%
171
+106%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−100%
170−180
+100%
Dota 2 120−130
−41.5%
174
+41.5%
Elden Ring 130−140
−136%
300−350
+136%
Far Cry 5 95−100
−54.6%
150
+54.6%
Fortnite 170−180
−79.1%
300−350
+79.1%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−130%
442
+130%
Grand Theft Auto V 120−130
−41.5%
174
+41.5%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+19%
79
−19%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
−7%
210−220
+7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
−101%
150−160
+101%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
−24.3%
170−180
+24.3%
Valorant 150−160
−212%
450−500
+212%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
−11.4%
110−120
+11.4%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
−80.7%
150
+80.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−100%
170−180
+100%
Dota 2 120−130
−103%
250−260
+103%
Far Cry 5 95−100
−61.9%
150−160
+61.9%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−112%
407
+112%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
−7%
210−220
+7%
Valorant 150−160
−212%
450−500
+212%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 70−75
−112%
155
+112%
Elden Ring 80−85
−196%
240−250
+196%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
−112%
155
+112%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−138%
90−95
+138%
World of Tanks 250−260
−106%
500−550
+106%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−19.2%
85−90
+19.2%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−138%
95
+138%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−100%
80−85
+100%
Far Cry 5 120−130
−25%
160−170
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−168%
306
+168%
Metro Exodus 85−90
−67.1%
140−150
+67.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−130%
159
+130%
Valorant 120−130
−229%
400−450
+229%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+13.9%
36
−13.9%
Dota 2 75−80
−133%
182
+133%
Elden Ring 35−40
−253%
130−140
+253%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
−133%
182
+133%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−155%
84
+155%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−63.3%
200−210
+63.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−146%
60−65
+146%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
−133%
182
+133%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−97.8%
90−95
+97.8%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−171%
110−120
+171%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−106%
35−40
+106%
Dota 2 75−80
−105%
160−170
+105%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−78%
100−110
+78%
Fortnite 55−60
−71.4%
95−100
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−149%
162
+149%
Valorant 65−70
−262%
230−240
+262%

This is how RTX A4000 Mobile and RTX 4070 Ti SUPER compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 126% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 109% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 113% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A4000 Mobile is 19% faster.
  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 262% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A4000 Mobile is ahead in 2 tests (4%)
  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is ahead in 51 test (93%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.52 82.59
Recency 12 April 2021 8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 285 Watt

RTX A4000 Mobile has 147.8% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, on the other hand, has a 109% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A4000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile
RTX A4000 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 21 vote

Rate RTX A4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2959 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.