Arc A770 vs RTX A4000 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A4000 Mobile with Arc A770, including specs and performance data.

RTX A4000 Mobile
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
39.52
+15.6%

RTX A4000 Mobile outperforms Arc A770 by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking112153
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data55.96
Power efficiency23.7110.49
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGA104DG2-512
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51204096
Core clock speed1140 MHz2100 MHz
Boost clock speed1680 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate268.8614.4
Floating-point processing power17.2 TFLOPS19.66 TFLOPS
ROPs80128
TMUs160256
Tensor Cores160512
Ray Tracing Cores4032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A4000 Mobile 39.52
+15.6%
Arc A770 34.20

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A4000 Mobile 15197
+15.5%
Arc A770 13152

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120−130
+7.1%
112
−7.1%
1440p70−75
+9.4%
64
−9.4%
4K45−50
+9.8%
41
−9.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.94
1440pno data5.14
4Kno data8.02

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
−39.8%
116
+39.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+18.1%
70−75
−18.1%
Elden Ring 130−140
+58%
88
−58%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+9.4%
95−100
−9.4%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
−19.3%
99
+19.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+18.1%
70−75
−18.1%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−58.3%
304
+58.3%
Metro Exodus 90−95
−27.7%
120
+27.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+11.6%
65−70
−11.6%
Valorant 150−160
+16.2%
130−140
−16.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+9.4%
95−100
−9.4%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
−6%
88
+6%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+18.1%
70−75
−18.1%
Dota 2 120−130
+17.1%
105
−17.1%
Elden Ring 130−140
+18.8%
110−120
−18.8%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+36.6%
71
−36.6%
Fortnite 170−180
+10.3%
150−160
−10.3%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−34.4%
258
+34.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 120−130
+17.1%
105
−17.1%
Metro Exodus 90−95
−5.3%
99
+5.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+6.3%
180−190
−6.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+11.6%
65−70
−11.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
+18.6%
110−120
−18.6%
Valorant 150−160
+16.2%
130−140
−16.2%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0.4%
270−280
−0.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+9.4%
95−100
−9.4%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
83
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+18.1%
70−75
−18.1%
Dota 2 120−130
+23%
100−105
−23%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+6.6%
90−95
−6.6%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−12.5%
216
+12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+6.3%
180−190
−6.3%
Valorant 150−160
+16.2%
130−140
−16.2%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 70−75
+62.2%
45
−62.2%
Elden Ring 80−85
+22.7%
65−70
−22.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+62.2%
45
−62.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+18.2%
30−35
−18.2%
World of Tanks 250−260
+14.2%
210−220
−14.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+10.6%
65−70
−10.6%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−47.5%
59
+47.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+21.2%
30−35
−21.2%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+17.4%
100−110
−17.4%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−38.6%
158
+38.6%
Metro Exodus 85−90
−7.1%
91
+7.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+15%
60
−15%
Valorant 120−130
+21.6%
100−110
−21.6%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+46.4%
28
−46.4%
Dota 2 75−80
+62.5%
48
−62.5%
Elden Ring 35−40
+22.6%
30−35
−22.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+62.5%
48
−62.5%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−42.4%
47
+42.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+18.5%
100−110
−18.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+18.2%
21−24
−18.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+62.5%
48
−62.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+17.9%
35−40
−17.9%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+20.6%
30−35
−20.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Dota 2 75−80
+20%
65−70
−20%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+22.9%
45−50
−22.9%
Fortnite 55−60
+21.7%
45−50
−21.7%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−36.9%
89
+36.9%
Valorant 65−70
+26.9%
50−55
−26.9%

This is how RTX A4000 Mobile and Arc A770 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4000 Mobile is 7% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A4000 Mobile is 9% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A4000 Mobile is 10% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A4000 Mobile is 63% faster.
  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Arc A770 is 58% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A4000 Mobile is ahead in 46 tests (75%)
  • Arc A770 is ahead in 13 tests (21%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.52 34.20
Recency 12 April 2021 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 225 Watt

RTX A4000 Mobile has a 15.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 95.7% lower power consumption.

Arc A770, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A770 in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Arc A770 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile
RTX A4000 Mobile
Intel Arc A770
Arc A770

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 21 vote

Rate RTX A4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 5351 vote

Rate Arc A770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.