GeForce GTX 1630 vs Radeon RX 6300 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated385
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data11.97
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 24TU117
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)28 June 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024512
Core clock speedno data1740 MHz
Boost clock speed2500 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate160.057.12
Floating-point processing power5.12 TFLOPS1.828 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs6432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data145 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed16 GB/s1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s96 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 75 Watt

RX 6300 XT has a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 1630, on the other hand, has 33.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6300 XT and GeForce GTX 1630. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6300 XT
Radeon RX 6300 XT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
GeForce GTX 1630

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 14 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6300 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 1225 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.