GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs RTX A1000 Mobile

Place in the ranking	224	36
Place by popularity	not in top-100	16
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	83.11
Power efficiency	28.53	25.50
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GA107	AD106
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)	18 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	4352
Core clock speed	630 MHz	2310 MHz
Boost clock speed	1140 MHz	2535 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	160 Watt
Texture fill rate	72.96	344.8
Floating-point processing power	4.669 TFLOPS	22.06 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	48
TMUs	64	136
Tensor Cores	64	136
Ray Tracing Cores	16	34

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	240 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1375 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	176.0 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.6	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A1000 Mobile 23.92

RTX 4060 Ti 57.02
+138%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A1000 Mobile 9559

RTX 4060 Ti 22787
+138%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	67 −124%	150−160 +124%
1440p	27 −122%	60−65 +122%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.66
1440p	no data	6.65

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	66 −127%	150−160 +127%
Cyberpunk 2077	61 −130%	140−150 +130%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 −137%	180−190 +137%
Counter-Strike 2	50 −120%	110−120 +120%
Cyberpunk 2077	25 −120%	55−60 +120%
Forza Horizon 4	109 −129%	250−260 +129%
Forza Horizon 5	65−70 −127%	150−160 +127%
Metro Exodus	65−70 −131%	150−160 +131%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −122%	120−130 +122%
Valorant	100−105 −130%	230−240 +130%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 −137%	180−190 +137%
Counter-Strike 2	42 −138%	100−105 +138%
Cyberpunk 2077	18 −122%	40−45 +122%
Dota 2	98 −135%	230−240 +135%
Far Cry 5	74 −130%	170−180 +130%
Fortnite	120−130 −132%	290−300 +132%
Forza Horizon 4	87 −130%	200−210 +130%
Forza Horizon 5	65−70 −127%	150−160 +127%
Grand Theft Auto V	91 −131%	210−220 +131%
Metro Exodus	16 −119%	35−40 +119%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 −124%	350−400 +124%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −122%	120−130 +122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 −135%	190−200 +135%
Valorant	100−105 −130%	230−240 +130%
World of Tanks	250−260 −133%	600−650 +133%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 −137%	180−190 +137%
Counter-Strike 2	35 −129%	80−85 +129%
Cyberpunk 2077	15 −133%	35−40 +133%
Dota 2	132 −127%	300−310 +127%
Far Cry 5	75−80 −134%	180−190 +134%
Forza Horizon 4	76 −137%	180−190 +137%
Forza Horizon 5	65−70 −127%	150−160 +127%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 −124%	350−400 +124%
Valorant	100−105 −130%	230−240 +130%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	40−45 −138%	100−105 +138%
Grand Theft Auto V	40−45 −138%	100−105 +138%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −129%	400−450 +129%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −117%	50−55 +117%
World of Tanks	160−170 −112%	350−400 +112%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 −120%	110−120 +120%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −127%	50−55 +127%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −138%	50−55 +138%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −136%	170−180 +136%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −127%	150−160 +127%
Forza Horizon 5	40−45 −138%	95−100 +138%
Metro Exodus	55−60 −128%	130−140 +128%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −130%	85−90 +130%
Valorant	65−70 −124%	150−160 +124%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	20−22 −125%	45−50 +125%
Dota 2	40−45 −133%	100−105 +133%
Grand Theft Auto V	40−45 −133%	100−105 +133%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −137%	45−50 +137%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 −137%	180−190 +137%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −119%	35−40 +119%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 −133%	100−105 +133%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −131%	60−65 +131%
Counter-Strike 2	20−22 −125%	45−50 +125%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −125%	18−20 +125%
Dota 2	40−45 −133%	100−105 +133%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −127%	75−80 +127%
Fortnite	30−35 −126%	70−75 +126%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −137%	90−95 +137%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 −138%	50−55 +138%
Valorant	30−35 −134%	75−80 +134%

This is how RTX A1000 Mobile and RTX 4060 Ti compete in popular games:

RTX 4060 Ti is 124% faster in 1080p
RTX 4060 Ti is 122% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	23.92	57.02
Recency	30 March 2022	18 May 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	160 Watt

RTX A1000 Mobile has 166.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 4060 Ti, on the other hand, has a 138.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A1000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A1000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.