GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile with GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023
16 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
59.17
+235%

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms GTX 1650 Mobile by a whopping 235% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking42338
Place by popularitynot in top-10071
Power efficiency35.6325.49
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameAD103TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 March 2023 (2 years ago)15 April 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores97281024
Core clock speed1425 MHz1380 MHz
Boost clock speed2115 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors45,900 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate643.099.84
Floating-point processing power41.15 TFLOPS3.195 TFLOPS
ROPs11232
TMUs30464
Tensor Cores304no data
Ray Tracing Cores76no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.2.140
CUDA8.97.5
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 59.17
+235%
GTX 1650 Mobile 17.64

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 23873
+235%
GTX 1650 Mobile 7116

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 51771
+294%
GTX 1650 Mobile 13132

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 30422
+227%
GTX 1650 Mobile 9313

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 14861
+326%
GTX 1650 Mobile 3488

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD190−200
+228%
58
−228%
1440p120−130
+224%
37
−224%
4K75−80
+226%
23
−226%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 131
+0%
131
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+0%
52
+0%
Dead Island 2 92
+0%
92
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 113
+0%
113
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+0%
41
+0%
Dead Island 2 75
+0%
75
+0%
Far Cry 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 82
+0%
82
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 68
+0%
68
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 164
+0%
164
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 67
+0%
67
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130
+0%
130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+0%
32
+0%
Dead Island 2 50
+0%
50
+0%
Dota 2 96
+0%
96
+0%
Far Cry 5 54
+0%
54
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80
+0%
80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 59
+0%
59
+0%
Metro Exodus 33
+0%
33
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+0%
62
+0%
Valorant 148
+0%
148
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
Dead Island 2 39
+0%
39
+0%
Dota 2 89
+0%
89
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 62
+0%
62
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 71
+0%
71
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
+0%
36
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 72
+0%
72
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 20
+0%
20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 159
+0%
159
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 47
+0%
47
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+0%
15
+0%
Dead Island 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 44
+0%
44
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Dead Island 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 12
+0%
12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21
+0%
21
+0%
Valorant 90
+0%
90
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 25
+0%
25
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+0%
5
+0%
Dead Island 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 45
+0%
45
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile and GTX 1650 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is 228% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is 224% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is 226% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 59.17 17.64
Recency 21 March 2023 15 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 235.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 1650 Mobile, on the other hand, has 140% lower power consumption.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 57 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3577 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile or GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.