RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation with RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
2023
20 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
54.22

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4633
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency55.3328.40
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameAD104no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date21 March 2023 (1 year ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores61447424
Core clock speed720 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1560 MHzno data
Number of transistors35,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt150 Watt (60 - 150 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate299.5no data
Floating-point processing power19.17 TFLOPSno data
ROPs80no data
TMUs192no data
Tensor Cores192no data
Ray Tracing Cores48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length168 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount20 GB12 GB
Memory bus width160 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth280.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4ano data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.9-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 54.22
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 59.64
+10%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 20922
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 23015
+10%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 54.22 59.64
Maximum RAM amount 20 GB 12 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 150 Watt

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has a 66.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 10% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile.

Be aware that RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 49 votes

Rate RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.