Moore Threads MTT S80 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 4000 Ada Generation with Moore Threads MTT S80, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation
2023
20 GB GDDR6, 130 Watt
57.22
+857%

RTX 4000 Ada Generation outperforms Moore Threads MTT S80 by a whopping 857% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking48635
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency33.951.81
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)MUSA
GPU code nameAD104Chunxiao
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date9 August 2023 (2 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores61444096
Core clock speed1500 MHz1800 MHz
Boost clock speed2175 MHzno data
Number of transistors35,800 million22,000 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt255 Watt
Texture fill rate417.6460.8
Floating-point processing power26.73 TFLOPS14.75 TFLOPS
ROPs64256
TMUs192256
Tensor Cores192no data
Ray Tracing Cores48no data
L1 Cache6 MBno data
L2 Cache48 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length245 mm285 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount20 GB16 GB
Memory bus width160 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth360.0 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA8.9-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation 57.22
+857%
Moore Threads MTT S80 5.98

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation 24045
+857%
Samples: 703
Moore Threads MTT S80 2513

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 57.22 5.98
Maximum RAM amount 20 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 255 Watt

RTX 4000 Ada Generation has a 856.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 96.2% lower power consumption.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Moore Threads MTT S80 in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation graphics card while Moore Threads MTT S80 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Moore Threads MTT S80
Moore Threads MTT S80

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 65 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3 votes

Rate Moore Threads MTT S80 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 4000 Ada Generation or Moore Threads MTT S80, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.