Moore Threads MTT S50 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking46not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency33.60no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)MUSA
GPU code nameAD104MTT Gen 1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date9 August 2023 (2 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores61442048
Core clock speed1500 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speed2175 MHzno data
Number of transistors35,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate417.6153.6
Floating-point processing power26.73 TFLOPS4.915 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs192128
Tensor Cores192no data
Ray Tracing Cores48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length245 mm251 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount20 GB8 GB
Memory bus width160 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth360.0 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI 2.0, 2x DisplayPort 1.2
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA8.9-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 20 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 85 Watt

RTX 4000 Ada Generation has a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

Moore Threads MTT S50, on the other hand, has 52.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX 4000 Ada Generation and Moore Threads MTT S50. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation graphics card while Moore Threads MTT S50 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Moore Threads MTT S50
Moore Threads MTT S50

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 62 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Moore Threads MTT S50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 4000 Ada Generation or Moore Threads MTT S50, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.