Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS with Iris Pro Graphics P6300, including specs and performance data.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
30 Watt
10.65
+157%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS outperforms Iris Pro Graphics P6300 by a whopping 157% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking432690
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.5419.08
Architectureno dataGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameno dataBroadwell GT3e
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release dateno data5 September 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536384
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistorsno data189 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data38.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6144 TFLOPS
ROPsno data6
TMUsno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataIGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speed8448 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.1.80

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD34
+183%
12−14
−183%
1440p17
+183%
6−7
−183%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.65 4.14
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 15 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS has a 157.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is a notebook card while Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Iris Pro Graphics P6300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 10 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 13 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.