GeForce 7300 GT vs Arc Graphics 130V

Place in the ranking	415	1292
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.01
Power efficiency	no data	1.01
Architecture	Xe² (2025)	Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code name	Lunar Lake iGPU	G73
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	no data	15 May 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$149.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	7	no data
Core clock speed	no data	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1850 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	no data	177 million
Manufacturing process technology	3 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	24 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	2.800
ROPs	no data	8
TMUs	no data	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	no data	PCIe 1.0 x16
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	LPDDR5x	DDR2
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	128 MB
Memory bus width	no data	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	325 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	10.4 GB/s
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_2	9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model	no data	3.0
OpenGL	no data	2.1
OpenCL	no data	N/A
Vulkan	-	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc Graphics 130V 11.40
+3253%

7300 GT 0.34

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 130V 4569
+3211%

7300 GT 138

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

0−1

Cost per frame, $

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2

41
+4000%

1−2

−4000%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +3800%	1−2 −3800%
Counter-Strike 2	31	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	71 +3450%	2−3 −3450%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35	0−1
Metro Exodus	30−35	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33	0−1
Valorant	45−50 +4600%	1−2 −4600%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +3800%	1−2 −3800%
Counter-Strike 2	28	0−1
Dota 2	41 +4000%	1−2 −4000%
Far Cry 5	28	0−1
Fortnite	65−70 +3300%	2−3 −3300%
Forza Horizon 4	58 +5700%	1−2 −5700%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	40−45 +4200%	1−2 −4200%
Metro Exodus	30−35	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	85−90 +4350%	2−3 −4350%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +3500%	1−2 −3500%
Valorant	45−50 +4600%	1−2 −4600%
World of Tanks	160−170 +4000%	4−5 −4000%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +3800%	1−2 −3800%
Counter-Strike 2	25	0−1
Far Cry 5	45−50 +4500%	1−2 −4500%
Forza Horizon 4	48 +4700%	1−2 −4700%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	85−90 +4350%	2−3 −4350%
Valorant	45−50 +4600%	1−2 −4600%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11	0−1
World of Tanks	80−85 +4100%	2−3 −4100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24	0−1
Far Cry 5	27−30	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	27−30	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	18−20	0−1
Metro Exodus	24−27	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18	0−1
Valorant	27−30	0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	4−5	0−1
Dota 2	21−24	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24	0−1
Metro Exodus	7−8	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 +3400%	1−2 −3400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	4−5	0−1
Far Cry 5	14−16	0−1
Fortnite	12−14	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	16−18	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	9−10	0−1
Valorant	12−14	0−1

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	11.40	0.34
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	128 MB
Chip lithography	3 nm	90 nm

Arc Graphics 130V has a 3252.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Graphics 130V is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7300 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc Graphics 130V is a notebook card while GeForce 7300 GT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.