Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs Qualcomm Adreno 685
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Qualcomm Adreno 685 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 685 by a whopping 344% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 915 | 494 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 23.34 | no data |
| Architecture | no data | Xe LPG (2023) |
| GPU code name | no data | Meteor Lake iGPU |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 6 December 2018 (6 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 4 |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1950 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | + | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 | 12_2 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 5−6
−400%
| 25
+400%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6
−160%
|
13
+160%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−300%
|
16−18
+300%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
−600%
|
40−45
+600%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6
−120%
|
11
+120%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−300%
|
16−18
+300%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 7−8
−457%
|
35−40
+457%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−417%
|
30−35
+417%
|
| Fortnite | 10−11
−300%
|
40−45
+300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
−355%
|
50
+355%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 4−5
−625%
|
27−30
+625%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−183%
|
30−35
+183%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
−130%
|
90−95
+130%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
−600%
|
40−45
+600%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6
−160%
|
13
+160%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 40−45
−342%
|
190−200
+342%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−400%
|
20−22
+400%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
−335%
|
100−105
+335%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 7−8
−457%
|
35−40
+457%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−300%
|
24
+300%
|
| Fortnite | 10−11
−480%
|
55−60
+480%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
−255%
|
39
+255%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 4−5
−625%
|
27−30
+625%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 4−5
−275%
|
15
+275%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4−5
−375%
|
18−20
+375%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−183%
|
30−35
+183%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
−213%
|
24−27
+213%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
−130%
|
90−95
+130%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
−600%
|
40−45
+600%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−400%
|
20−22
+400%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
−335%
|
100−105
+335%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 7−8
−329%
|
30−33
+329%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−417%
|
30−35
+417%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
−173%
|
30
+173%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−183%
|
30−35
+183%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
−338%
|
35−40
+338%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
−130%
|
90−95
+130%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 10−11
−300%
|
40−45
+300%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6
−320%
|
21−24
+320%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 14−16
−387%
|
70−75
+387%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
−133%
|
45−50
+133%
|
| Valorant | 16−18
−341%
|
75−80
+341%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 5−6
−320%
|
21−24
+320%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−567%
|
20−22
+567%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−360%
|
21−24
+360%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−225%
|
12−14
+225%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 4−5
−300%
|
16−18
+300%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−33.3%
|
20−22
+33.3%
|
| Valorant | 10−12
−309%
|
45−50
+309%
|
4K
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 5−6
−320%
|
21−24
+320%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−900%
|
10−11
+900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−1500%
|
16−18
+1500%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
−200%
|
9−10
+200%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 3−4
−300%
|
12−14
+300%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Valorant | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Valorant | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
This is how Qualcomm Adreno 685 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compete in popular games:
- Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 400% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 1500% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) performs better in 37 tests (64%)
- there's a draw in 21 tests (36%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.12 | 9.42 |
| Recency | 6 December 2018 | 14 December 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm |
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 344.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm Adreno 685 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
