Radeon 890M vs Quadro T500 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T500 Mobile with Radeon 890M, including specs and performance data.

T500 Mobile
2020
2 GB GDDR6, 18 Watt
9.01

890M outperforms T500 Mobile by a whopping 143% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking483253
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency34.35100.00
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.5 (2024)
GPU code nameTU117Strix Point
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date2 December 2020 (4 years ago)15 July 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8961024
Core clock speed1365 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1695 MHz2900 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate94.92185.6
Floating-point processing power3.037 TFLOPS5.939 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs5664
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth80 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T500 Mobile 9.01
Radeon 890M 21.86
+143%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T500 Mobile 7996
Radeon 890M 16023
+100%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T500 Mobile 4225
Radeon 890M 9573
+127%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

T500 Mobile 23453
Radeon 890M 54704
+133%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

T500 Mobile 1788
Radeon 890M 3533
+97.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
−22.2%
44
+22.2%
1440p15
−133%
35−40
+133%
4K17
−135%
40−45
+135%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−127%
50−55
+127%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−141%
65−70
+141%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Far Cry 5 30
−133%
70−75
+133%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−140%
60−65
+140%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−133%
140−150
+133%
Hitman 3 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+525%
8−9
−525%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−140%
60−65
+140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+650%
4−5
−650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+114%
27−30
−114%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+633%
3−4
−633%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−141%
65−70
+141%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Far Cry 5 28
−132%
65−70
+132%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−140%
60−65
+140%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−133%
140−150
+133%
Hitman 3 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+525%
8−9
−525%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−132%
65−70
+132%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−140%
60−65
+140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+650%
4−5
−650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+211%
9−10
−211%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+114%
27−30
−114%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+633%
3−4
−633%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−141%
65−70
+141%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Far Cry 5 27
−141%
65−70
+141%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−140%
60−65
+140%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−133%
140−150
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+111%
9−10
−111%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−133%
140−150
+133%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Hitman 3 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−137%
90−95
+137%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−128%
130−140
+128%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Hitman 3 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−136%
85−90
+136%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 0−1
Battlefield 5 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−118%
24−27
+118%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how T500 Mobile and Radeon 890M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 890M is 22% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 890M is 133% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 890M is 135% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T500 Mobile is 800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T500 Mobile is ahead in 15 tests (65%)
  • there's a draw in 8 tests (35%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.01 21.86
Recency 2 December 2020 15 July 2024
Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 890M has a 142.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 200% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 890M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T500 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T500 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon 890M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Quadro T500 Mobile
AMD Radeon 890M
Radeon 890M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 106 votes

Rate Quadro T500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 107 votes

Rate Radeon 890M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.