RTX A2000 12 GB vs Quadro T2000 Max-Q

Quadro T400 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q
VS
RTX A1000 RTX A2000 RTX A2000 12 GB RTX A4000 RTX A4000H RTX A4500 RTX A5000 RTX A5000-8Q RTX A5000-12Q RTX A5500

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T2000 Max-Q with RTX A2000 12 GB, including specs and performance data.

T2000 Max-Q
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
17.73

RTX A2000 12 GB outperforms T2000 Max-Q by an impressive 99% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

T2000 Max-Q T2000 Max-Q
RTX A2000 12 GB RTX A2000 12 GB

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking317141
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data93.40
Power efficiency30.9035.06
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU117GA106
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)23 November 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10243328
Core clock speed1200 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate103.7124.8
Floating-point processing power3.318 TFLOPS7.987 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs64104
Tensor Coresno data104
Ray Tracing Coresno data26

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.58.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

T2000 Max-Q 17.73
RTX A2000 12 GB 35.21
+98.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T2000 Max-Q 6904
RTX A2000 12 GB 13714
+98.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD57
−93%
110−120
+93%
1440p26
−92.3%
50−55
+92.3%
4K38
−97.4%
75−80
+97.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.08
1440pno data8.98
4Kno data5.99

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
−93.2%
85−90
+93.2%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−93.5%
60−65
+93.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−85.7%
65−70
+85.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
−93.2%
85−90
+93.2%
Battlefield 5 70−75
−97.2%
140−150
+97.2%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−93.5%
60−65
+93.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−85.7%
65−70
+85.7%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−93%
110−120
+93%
Fortnite 90−95
−95.7%
180−190
+95.7%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−88.4%
130−140
+88.4%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
−95.7%
90−95
+95.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−90.5%
120−130
+90.5%
Valorant 130−140
−97%
260−270
+97%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
−93.2%
85−90
+93.2%
Battlefield 5 70−75
−97.2%
140−150
+97.2%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−93.5%
60−65
+93.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
−86.9%
400−450
+86.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−85.7%
65−70
+85.7%
Dota 2 124
−93.5%
240−250
+93.5%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−93%
110−120
+93%
Fortnite 90−95
−95.7%
180−190
+95.7%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−88.4%
130−140
+88.4%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
−95.7%
90−95
+95.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
−87.5%
120−130
+87.5%
Metro Exodus 33
−97%
65−70
+97%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−90.5%
120−130
+90.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
−90.5%
120−130
+90.5%
Valorant 130−140
−97%
260−270
+97%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−97.2%
140−150
+97.2%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−93.5%
60−65
+93.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−85.7%
65−70
+85.7%
Dota 2 113
−94.7%
220−230
+94.7%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−93%
110−120
+93%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−88.4%
130−140
+88.4%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
−95.7%
90−95
+95.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−90.5%
120−130
+90.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
−97%
65−70
+97%
Valorant 130−140
−97%
260−270
+97%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
−95.7%
180−190
+95.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
−95.1%
240−250
+95.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−96.4%
55−60
+96.4%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−90.5%
40−45
+90.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−84%
300−310
+84%
Valorant 160−170
−80.7%
300−310
+80.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−97.9%
95−100
+97.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−80%
27−30
+80%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−89.2%
70−75
+89.2%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−90.5%
80−85
+90.5%
Forza Horizon 5 30−33
−83.3%
55−60
+83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−85.2%
50−55
+85.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
−97.4%
75−80
+97.4%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
−83.3%
55−60
+83.3%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−84.6%
24−27
+84.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%
Valorant 90−95
−91.5%
180−190
+91.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−80%
45−50
+80%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Dota 2 46
−95.7%
90−95
+95.7%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−94.4%
35−40
+94.4%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−89.7%
55−60
+89.7%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−80%
27−30
+80%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−87.5%
30−33
+87.5%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%

This is how T2000 Max-Q and RTX A2000 12 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 12 GB is 93% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A2000 12 GB is 92% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A2000 12 GB is 97% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 17.73 35.21
Recency 27 May 2019 23 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 70 Watt

T2000 Max-Q has 75% lower power consumption.

RTX A2000 12 GB, on the other hand, has a 98.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A2000 12 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T2000 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T2000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while RTX A2000 12 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Quadro T2000 Max-Q
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
RTX A2000 12 GB
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

T2000 Max-Q Quadro T2000 Max-Q
vs
M5000M Quadro M5000M
RTX A2000 12 GB RTX A2000 12 GB
vs
PRO W7500 Radeon PRO W7500
T2000 Max-Q Quadro T2000 Max-Q
vs
Pro 5500M Radeon Pro 5500M
RTX A2000 Mobile RTX A2000 Mobile
vs
T2000 Max-Q Quadro T2000 Max-Q
RTX A2000 RTX A2000
vs
T2000 Max-Q Quadro T2000 Max-Q
RTX 3080 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
vs
T2000 Max-Q Quadro T2000 Max-Q
RX 6400 Radeon RX 6400
vs
T2000 Max-Q Quadro T2000 Max-Q
RTX A4500 Mobile RTX A4500 Mobile
vs
T2000 Max-Q Quadro T2000 Max-Q
RTX 2050 Mobile GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
vs
T2000 Max-Q Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Radeon 680M Radeon 680M
vs
T2000 Max-Q Quadro T2000 Max-Q
RTX 4050 GeForce RTX 4050
vs
T2000 Max-Q Quadro T2000 Max-Q
RTX 4060 GeForce RTX 4060
vs
T2000 Max-Q Quadro T2000 Max-Q
RTX 4080 GeForce RTX 4080
vs
T2000 Max-Q Quadro T2000 Max-Q

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 75 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 146 votes

Rate RTX A2000 12 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro T2000 Max-Q or RTX A2000 12 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.