Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs Quadro T1200 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T1200 Mobile with Radeon RX 7650 GRE, including specs and performance data.

T1200 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 18 Watt
18.28

RX 7650 GRE outperforms T1200 Mobile by a whopping 134% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking328108
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data76.61
Power efficiency72.0618.37
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameTU117Navi 33
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date12 April 2021 (4 years ago)February 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$279

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242048
Core clock speed855 MHz1720 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHz2695 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt165 Watt
Texture fill rate91.20345.0
Floating-point processing power2.918 TFLOPS22.08 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs64128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data204 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD58
−124%
130−140
+124%
1440p33
−127%
75−80
+127%
4K81
−122%
180−190
+122%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.15
1440pno data3.72
4Kno data1.55

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−127%
170−180
+127%
Far Cry 5 65
−131%
150−160
+131%
Fortnite 95−100
−129%
220−230
+129%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−133%
170−180
+133%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
−132%
130−140
+132%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−124%
150−160
+124%
Valorant 130−140
−121%
300−310
+121%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−127%
170−180
+127%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
−125%
500−550
+125%
Dota 2 114
−128%
260−270
+128%
Far Cry 5 59
−120%
130−140
+120%
Fortnite 95−100
−129%
220−230
+129%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−133%
170−180
+133%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
−132%
130−140
+132%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
−125%
160−170
+125%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−124%
85−90
+124%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−124%
150−160
+124%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
−125%
160−170
+125%
Valorant 130−140
−121%
300−310
+121%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−127%
170−180
+127%
Dota 2 107
−124%
240−250
+124%
Far Cry 5 56
−132%
130−140
+132%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−133%
170−180
+133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−124%
150−160
+124%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
−130%
85−90
+130%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 95−100
−129%
220−230
+129%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
−133%
300−310
+133%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
−130%
85−90
+130%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−117%
50−55
+117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−132%
65−70
+132%
Valorant 170−180
−133%
400−450
+133%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−120%
110−120
+120%
Far Cry 5 41
−132%
95−100
+132%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−127%
100−105
+127%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
−125%
90−95
+125%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−119%
70−75
+119%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−120%
55−60
+120%
Valorant 100−105
−130%
230−240
+130%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−131%
60−65
+131%
Dota 2 109
−129%
250−260
+129%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−125%
45−50
+125%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−126%
70−75
+126%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−106%
35−40
+106%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
−122%
40−45
+122%

This is how T1200 Mobile and RX 7650 GRE compete in popular games:

  • RX 7650 GRE is 124% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7650 GRE is 127% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7650 GRE is 122% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.28 42.71
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 165 Watt

T1200 Mobile has 816.7% lower power consumption.

RX 7650 GRE, on the other hand, has a 133.6% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7650 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1200 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 7650 GRE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200
AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE
Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 153 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 11 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7650 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro T1200 Mobile or Radeon RX 7650 GRE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.