Radeon Pro W6600M vs Quadro T1200 Mobile

Quadro T400 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q
VS
Radeon Pro W5300M Radeon Pro W5500M Radeon Pro W6300M Radeon Pro W6600M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T1200 Mobile and Radeon Pro W6600M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

T1200 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 18 Watt
19.41

Pro W6600M outperforms T1200 Mobile by a considerable 49% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200
Pro W6600M Pro W6600M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking298201
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency74.0622.05
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU117Navi 23
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)8 June 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241792
Core clock speed855 MHz1224 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHz2034 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate91.20227.8
Floating-point processing power2.918 TFLOPS7.29 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs64112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD58
−46.6%
85−90
+46.6%
1440p33
−36.4%
45−50
+36.4%
4K81
−48.1%
120−130
+48.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−36.8%
100−110
+36.8%
Far Cry 5 65
−36.9%
85−90
+36.9%
Fortnite 95−100
−31.6%
120−130
+31.6%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−42.7%
100−110
+42.7%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
−52.9%
75−80
+52.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−55.1%
100−110
+55.1%
Valorant 130−140
−28.1%
170−180
+28.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−36.8%
100−110
+36.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
−18.7%
260−270
+18.7%
Dota 2 114
−13.2%
120−130
+13.2%
Far Cry 5 59
−50.8%
85−90
+50.8%
Fortnite 95−100
−31.6%
120−130
+31.6%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−42.7%
100−110
+42.7%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
−52.9%
75−80
+52.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
−36.6%
95−100
+36.6%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−56.4%
60−65
+56.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−55.1%
100−110
+55.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
−18.3%
80−85
+18.3%
Valorant 130−140
−28.1%
170−180
+28.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−36.8%
100−110
+36.8%
Dota 2 107
−20.6%
120−130
+20.6%
Far Cry 5 56
−58.9%
85−90
+58.9%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−42.7%
100−110
+42.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−55.1%
100−110
+55.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
−127%
80−85
+127%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 95−100
−31.6%
120−130
+31.6%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
−43.2%
180−190
+43.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
−37.8%
50−55
+37.8%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−60.9%
35−40
+60.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%
Valorant 170−180
−24%
210−220
+24%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−42.3%
70−75
+42.3%
Far Cry 5 41
−53.7%
60−65
+53.7%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−54.3%
70−75
+54.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
−57.1%
65−70
+57.1%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−57.6%
50−55
+57.6%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−53.3%
21−24
+53.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−57.7%
40−45
+57.7%
Valorant 100−110
−55.3%
160−170
+55.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−55.6%
40−45
+55.6%
Dota 2 109
+26.7%
85−90
−26.7%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−60%
30−35
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−50%
45−50
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
−72.2%
30−35
+72.2%

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how T1200 Mobile and Pro W6600M compete in popular games:

  • Pro W6600M is 47% faster in 1080p
  • Pro W6600M is 36% faster in 1440p
  • Pro W6600M is 48% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 27% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro W6600M is 127% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • Pro W6600M is ahead in 43 tests (64%)
  • there's a draw in 23 tests (34%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 19.41 28.89
Recency 12 April 2021 8 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 90 Watt

T1200 Mobile has 400% lower power consumption.

Pro W6600M, on the other hand, has a 48.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro W6600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1200 Mobile in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200
AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Radeon Pro W6600M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile
vs
Pro 580X Radeon Pro 580X
Pro W6600M Radeon Pro W6600M
vs
RTX A4500 Embedded RTX A4500 Embedded
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile
vs
Pro 580 Radeon Pro 580
UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 730
vs
RTX 3090 SUPER RTX 3090 SUPER
RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600
vs
Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB
CMP 40HX CMP 40HX
vs
RX 7800 XT RX 7800 XT
RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q
vs
RTX A4000 Mobile RTX A4000 Mobile
RX 6800M Radeon RX 6800M
vs
Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU Pro 16-Core GPU
Vega 7 Radeon Vega 7
vs
UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile
Vega 7 Radeon Vega 7
vs
UHD Graphics G7 64EU Mobile UHD Graphics G7 64EU Mobile
Tesla M40 24 GB Tesla M40 24 GB
vs
Tesla K40st Tesla K40st
Tesla M40 24 GB Tesla M40 24 GB
vs
Quadro K4000 Quadro K4000
A2 A2
vs
Tesla T10 16 GB T10 16 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 146 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro T1200 Mobile or Radeon Pro W6600M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.