RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell vs Quadro T1200 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T1200 Mobile with RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

T1200 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 18 Watt
18.29

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell outperforms T1200 Mobile by a whopping 290% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking32921
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.81
Power efficiency72.278.46
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameTU117GB202
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date12 April 2021 (4 years ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$8,565

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102424064
Core clock speed855 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHz2617 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate91.201,968
Floating-point processing power2.918 TFLOPS126 TFLOPS
ROPs32192
TMUs64752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount4 GB96 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.4
CUDA7.512.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD58
−279%
220−230
+279%
1440p33
−264%
120−130
+264%
4K81
−270%
300−350
+270%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data38.93
1440pno data71.38
4Kno data28.55

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−287%
290−300
+287%
Far Cry 5 65
−285%
250−260
+285%
Fortnite 95−100
−265%
350−400
+265%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−284%
280−290
+284%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
−275%
210−220
+275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−288%
260−270
+288%
Valorant 130−140
−265%
500−550
+265%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−287%
290−300
+287%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
−283%
850−900
+283%
Dota 2 114
−251%
400−450
+251%
Far Cry 5 59
−290%
230−240
+290%
Fortnite 95−100
−265%
350−400
+265%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−284%
280−290
+284%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
−275%
210−220
+275%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
−280%
270−280
+280%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−268%
140−150
+268%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−288%
260−270
+288%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
−280%
270−280
+280%
Valorant 130−140
−265%
500−550
+265%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−287%
290−300
+287%
Dota 2 107
−274%
400−450
+274%
Far Cry 5 56
−275%
210−220
+275%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−284%
280−290
+284%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−288%
260−270
+288%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
−278%
140−150
+278%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 95−100
−265%
350−400
+265%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
−285%
500−550
+285%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
−278%
140−150
+278%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−270%
85−90
+270%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−257%
100−105
+257%
Valorant 170−180
−278%
650−700
+278%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−280%
190−200
+280%
Far Cry 5 41
−266%
150−160
+266%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−286%
170−180
+286%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
−275%
150−160
+275%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−275%
120−130
+275%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−280%
95−100
+280%
Valorant 100−105
−250%
350−400
+250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−270%
100−105
+270%
Dota 2 109
−267%
400−450
+267%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−275%
75−80
+275%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−287%
120−130
+287%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−282%
65−70
+282%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
−289%
70−75
+289%

This is how T1200 Mobile and RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 279% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 264% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 270% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.29 71.35
Recency 12 April 2021 18 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 96 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 600 Watt

T1200 Mobile has 3233.3% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, on the other hand, has a 290.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1200 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 153 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 15 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro T1200 Mobile or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.