Radeon 880M vs Quadro T600 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T600 Mobile with Radeon 880M, including specs and performance data.

T600 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 40 Watt
17.68

880M outperforms T600 Mobile by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking305275
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency31.6393.46
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.5 (2024)
GPU code nameTU117Strix Point
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)15 July 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896512
Core clock speed780 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1410 MHz2900 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate78.9692.80
Floating-point processing power2.527 TFLOPS2.97 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs5632
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T600 Mobile 17.68
Radeon 880M 19.59
+10.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T600 Mobile 7065
Radeon 880M 7829
+10.8%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T600 Mobile 10498
Radeon 880M 13892
+32.3%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T600 Mobile 7928
Radeon 880M 8371
+5.6%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

T600 Mobile 53941
+4.4%
Radeon 880M 51662

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

T600 Mobile 2766
Radeon 880M 3006
+8.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD51
+41.7%
36
−41.7%
1440p18−21
−27.8%
23
+27.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−8.1%
40−45
+8.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−8.5%
60−65
+8.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−8.1%
40−45
+8.1%
Far Cry 5 53
−3.8%
55−60
+3.8%
Fortnite 95−100
−1%
100−105
+1%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+4.1%
74
−4.1%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
−10.2%
50−55
+10.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−3.2%
130−140
+3.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−9.3%
45−50
+9.3%
Valorant 70−75
−10.8%
80−85
+10.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−8.5%
60−65
+8.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−8.1%
40−45
+8.1%
Dota 2 116
+119%
53
−119%
Far Cry 5 49
+11.4%
44
−11.4%
Fortnite 95−100
−8.1%
100−110
+8.1%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+22.2%
63
−22.2%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
−10.2%
50−55
+10.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 63
+21.2%
52
−21.2%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−10%
55−60
+10%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−7.9%
130−140
+7.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−9.3%
45−50
+9.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
−23.1%
60−65
+23.1%
Valorant 70−75
−10.8%
80−85
+10.8%
World of Tanks 220−230
−5.9%
230−240
+5.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−8.5%
60−65
+8.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−8.1%
40−45
+8.1%
Dota 2 107
−2.8%
110−120
+2.8%
Far Cry 5 45
−51.1%
65−70
+51.1%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+45.3%
53
−45.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−7.9%
130−140
+7.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 95−100
−1%
100−105
+1%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−13.8%
30−35
+13.8%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−9.8%
45−50
+9.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−8%
27−30
+8%
Valorant 45−50
−6.4%
50−55
+6.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−10.8%
40−45
+10.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−14.6%
55−60
+14.6%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−12.8%
50−55
+12.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
−6.4%
50−55
+6.4%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−9.7%
30−35
+9.7%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−11.1%
20−22
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−8.3%
24−27
+8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−9.1%
60−65
+9.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 42
+0%
42
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 33
+0%
33
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 26
+0%
26
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21
+0%
21
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 22
+0%
22
+0%
World of Tanks 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 19
+0%
19
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

This is how T600 Mobile and Radeon 880M compete in popular games:

  • T600 Mobile is 42% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 880M is 28% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the T600 Mobile is 119% faster.
  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 880M is 51% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T600 Mobile is ahead in 6 tests (11%)
  • Radeon 880M is ahead in 28 tests (51%)
  • there's a draw in 21 test (38%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.68 19.59
Recency 12 April 2021 15 July 2024
Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 880M has a 10.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 200% more advanced lithography process, and 166.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 880M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T600 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T600 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon 880M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T600 Mobile
Quadro T600 Mobile
AMD Radeon 880M
Radeon 880M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 35 votes

Rate Quadro T600 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 12 votes

Rate Radeon 880M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.