RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell vs Quadro T600 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T600 Mobile with RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

T600 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 40 Watt
17.80

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell outperforms T600 Mobile by a whopping 301% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking33522
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.81
Power efficiency31.738.48
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameTU117GB202
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date12 April 2021 (4 years ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$8,565

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores89624064
Core clock speed780 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speed1410 MHz2617 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate78.961,968
Floating-point processing power2.527 TFLOPS126 TFLOPS
ROPs32192
TMUs56752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount4 GB96 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA7.512.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

T600 Mobile 17.80
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 71.35
+301%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T600 Mobile 7084
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 28386
+301%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD51
−292%
200−210
+292%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data42.83

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−297%
290−300
+297%
Far Cry 5 53
−296%
210−220
+296%
Fortnite 90−95
−272%
350−400
+272%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−294%
280−290
+294%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
−289%
210−220
+289%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−300%
260−270
+300%
Valorant 130−140
−273%
500−550
+273%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−297%
290−300
+297%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
−290%
850−900
+290%
Dota 2 116
−288%
450−500
+288%
Far Cry 5 49
−288%
190−200
+288%
Fortnite 90−95
−272%
350−400
+272%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−294%
280−290
+294%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
−289%
210−220
+289%
Grand Theft Auto V 63
−297%
250−260
+297%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−289%
140−150
+289%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−300%
260−270
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
−285%
200−210
+285%
Valorant 130−140
−273%
500−550
+273%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−297%
290−300
+297%
Dota 2 107
−274%
400−450
+274%
Far Cry 5 45
−300%
180−190
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−294%
280−290
+294%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−300%
260−270
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
−293%
110−120
+293%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
−272%
350−400
+272%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
−297%
500−550
+297%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−279%
110−120
+279%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−286%
85−90
+286%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−270%
100−105
+270%
Valorant 160−170
−285%
650−700
+285%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−288%
190−200
+288%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−295%
150−160
+295%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−295%
170−180
+295%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
−285%
150−160
+285%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−287%
120−130
+287%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−300%
100−105
+300%
Valorant 95−100
−261%
350−400
+261%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%
Dota 2 60−65
−300%
240−250
+300%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−295%
75−80
+295%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−300%
120−130
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−282%
65−70
+282%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
−282%
65−70
+282%

This is how T600 Mobile and RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 292% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.80 71.35
Recency 12 April 2021 18 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 96 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 600 Watt

T600 Mobile has 1400% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, on the other hand, has a 300.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T600 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T600 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T600 Mobile
Quadro T600
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 36 votes

Rate Quadro T600 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 15 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro T600 Mobile or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.