Radeon RX 6950 XT vs Quadro T1000
Aggregated performance score
Radeon RX 6950 XT outperforms Quadro T1000 by 329% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 295 | 14 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 8.60 | 19.62 |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2021) | Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022) |
| GPU code name | TU117 | Navi |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 May 2019 (4 years ago) | 10 May 2022 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,099 |
| Current price | $920 | $961 (0.9x MSRP) |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
RX 6950 XT has 128% better value for money than Quadro T1000.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 5120 |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1925 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 2324 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 4,700 million | 26,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 335 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 743.7 |
Size and compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 3-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 18000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 576.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | no data | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| HDMI | no data | + |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | no data | 1.3 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Radeon RX 6950 XT outperforms Quadro T1000 by 329% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
Radeon RX 6950 XT outperforms Quadro T1000 by 329% in Passmark.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 50−55
−340%
| 220
+340%
|
| 1440p | 30−35
−363%
| 139
+363%
|
| 4K | 18−21
−389%
| 88
+389%
|
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 17.05 | 73.12 |
| Recency | 27 May 2019 | 10 May 2022 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 335 Watt |
The Radeon RX 6950 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1000 in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro T1000 is a workstation card while Radeon RX 6950 XT is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
