UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs Quadro T1000 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T1000 Mobile with UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, including specs and performance data.

T1000 Mobile
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
16.62
+272%

T1000 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs by a whopping 272% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking332662
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.3411.21
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameTU117Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76848
Core clock speed1395 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate69.84no data
Floating-point processing power2.235 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

T1000 Mobile 16.62
+272%
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 4.47

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T1000 Mobile 11377
+224%
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 3510

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

T1000 Mobile 31509
+196%
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 10650

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T1000 Mobile 8727
+276%
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 2321

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

T1000 Mobile 53629
+235%
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 15992

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

T1000 Mobile 375510
+285%
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 97416

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

T1000 Mobile 3261
+309%
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 798

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD63
+250%
18
−250%
4K48
+300%
12−14
−300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+273%
10−12
−273%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+164%
10−12
−164%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+200%
11
−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+273%
10−12
−273%
Battlefield 5 60
+216%
19
−216%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+164%
10−12
−164%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+267%
9−10
−267%
Far Cry 5 62
+288%
16
−288%
Fortnite 85−90
+252%
24−27
−252%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+230%
20−22
−230%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+389%
9−10
−389%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+247%
16−18
−247%
Valorant 120−130
+253%
36
−253%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+273%
10−12
−273%
Battlefield 5 52
+225%
16
−225%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+164%
10−12
−164%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+728%
25
−728%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+267%
9−10
−267%
Dota 2 114
+338%
26
−338%
Far Cry 5 57
+280%
15
−280%
Fortnite 85−90
+252%
24−27
−252%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+230%
20−22
−230%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+389%
9−10
−389%
Grand Theft Auto V 68
+656%
9
−656%
Metro Exodus 34
+325%
8−9
−325%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+247%
16−18
−247%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
+320%
15
−320%
Valorant 120−130
+127%
55−60
−127%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 47
+236%
14
−236%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+164%
10−12
−164%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+267%
9−10
−267%
Dota 2 107
+346%
24
−346%
Far Cry 5 53
+279%
14
−279%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+230%
20−22
−230%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+389%
9−10
−389%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+247%
16−18
−247%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+338%
8
−338%
Valorant 120−130
+127%
55−60
−127%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
+252%
24−27
−252%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+255%
30−35
−255%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+550%
4−5
−550%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+406%
30−35
−406%
Valorant 160−170
+240%
45−50
−240%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+2150%
2−3
−2150%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+290%
10−11
−290%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+383%
6−7
−383%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+257%
7−8
−257%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+350%
8−9
−350%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+81.3%
16−18
−81.3%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%
Valorant 85−90
+300%
21−24
−300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Dota 2 48
+243%
14−16
−243%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%

This is how T1000 Mobile and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs compete in popular games:

  • T1000 Mobile is 250% faster in 1080p
  • T1000 Mobile is 300% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1000 Mobile is 2200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, T1000 Mobile surpassed UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.62 4.47
Recency 27 May 2019 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 28 Watt

T1000 Mobile has a 271.8% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 78.6% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
Quadro T1000
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 155 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 501 vote

Rate UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro T1000 Mobile or UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.