UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) vs Quadro T1000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T1000 Mobile with UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU), including specs and performance data.

T1000 Mobile
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
16.98
+749%

T1000 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) by a whopping 749% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking321893
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.2713.70
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameTU117Gen. 11
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76832
Core clock speed1395 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate69.84no data
Floating-point processing power2.235 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1000 Mobile 16.98
+749%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 2.00

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T1000 Mobile 11377
+616%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 1589

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

T1000 Mobile 31509
+399%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 6317

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T1000 Mobile 8727
+759%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 1016

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

T1000 Mobile 53629
+669%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 6977

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

T1000 Mobile 375510
+420%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 72158

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

T1000 Mobile 3261
+888%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 330

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

T1000 Mobile 110
+775%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 13

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD62
+589%
9
−589%
4K48
+860%
5−6
−860%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48
+586%
7−8
−586%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+833%
3−4
−833%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+5400%
1−2
−5400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 53
+960%
5−6
−960%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%
Far Cry 5 49
+1533%
3−4
−1533%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+820%
5−6
−820%
Forza Horizon 4 119
+1388%
8−9
−1388%
Hitman 3 30−35
+357%
7−8
−357%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+394%
16−18
−394%
Metro Exodus 83
+822%
9−10
−822%
Red Dead Redemption 2 67
+1575%
4−5
−1575%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+450%
10−11
−450%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+140%
35−40
−140%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+443%
7−8
−443%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+833%
3−4
−833%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+5400%
1−2
−5400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 47
+840%
5−6
−840%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%
Far Cry 5 41
+1267%
3−4
−1267%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+820%
5−6
−820%
Forza Horizon 4 114
+1325%
8−9
−1325%
Hitman 3 30−35
+357%
7−8
−357%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+394%
16−18
−394%
Metro Exodus 63
+800%
7−8
−800%
Red Dead Redemption 2 52
+1200%
4−5
−1200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+511%
9
−511%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+225%
12−14
−225%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+140%
35−40
−140%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 29
+314%
7−8
−314%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+833%
3−4
−833%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 32
+540%
5−6
−540%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%
Far Cry 5 31
+933%
3−4
−933%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+1250%
8−9
−1250%
Hitman 3 30−35
+357%
7−8
−357%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+1300%
6
−1300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+323%
13
−323%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+1067%
3
−1067%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+140%
35−40
−140%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50
+1150%
4−5
−1150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+1000%
3−4
−1000%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+767%
3−4
−767%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+810%
10−11
−810%
Hitman 3 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+467%
6−7
−467%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+933%
3−4
−933%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+967%
3−4
−967%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+827%
10−12
−827%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Hitman 3 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+760%
10−11
−760%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%

This is how T1000 Mobile and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) compete in popular games:

  • T1000 Mobile is 589% faster in 1080p
  • T1000 Mobile is 860% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T1000 Mobile is 5400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, T1000 Mobile surpassed UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) in all 53 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.98 2.00
Recency 27 May 2019 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 4 Watt

T1000 Mobile has a 749% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 1150% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
Quadro T1000 Mobile
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 154 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 19 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.