Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs Quadro T1000 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T1000 Max-Q with Radeon RX 7900 XTX, including specs and performance data.

T1000 Max-Q
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
17.35

RX 7900 XTX outperforms T1000 Max-Q by a whopping 364% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3128
Place by popularitynot in top-10061
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data34.64
Power efficiency24.1915.81
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU117Navi 31
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)3 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8966144
Core clock speed765 MHz1929 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz2498 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt355 Watt
Texture fill rate75.60959.2
Floating-point processing power2.419 TFLOPS61.39 TFLOPS
ROPs32192
TMUs56384
Ray Tracing Coresno data96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data287 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1000 Max-Q 17.35
RX 7900 XTX 80.52
+364%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T1000 Max-Q 6695
RX 7900 XTX 31062
+364%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
−410%
255
+410%
1440p35−40
−394%
173
+394%
4K21−24
−405%
106
+405%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.92
1440pno data5.77
4Kno data9.42

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−796%
242
+796%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−326%
166
+326%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−876%
283
+876%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−328%
240−250
+328%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−243%
120−130
+243%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−756%
231
+756%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−188%
110−120
+188%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−328%
200−210
+328%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−128%
250−260
+128%
Hitman 3 30−35
−291%
120−130
+291%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−231%
280−290
+231%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−158%
150−160
+158%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−164%
120−130
+164%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−514%
350−400
+514%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−81.2%
150−160
+81.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−746%
330
+746%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−731%
241
+731%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−328%
240−250
+328%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−243%
120−130
+243%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−670%
208
+670%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−188%
110−120
+188%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−328%
200−210
+328%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−128%
250−260
+128%
Hitman 3 30−35
−291%
120−130
+291%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−231%
280−290
+231%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−158%
150−160
+158%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−164%
120−130
+164%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−839%
535
+839%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−343%
170−180
+343%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−81.2%
150−160
+81.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−244%
134
+244%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−624%
210
+624%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−243%
120−130
+243%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−637%
199
+637%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−188%
110−120
+188%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−168%
295
+168%
Hitman 3 30−35
−291%
120−130
+291%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−372%
406
+372%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−726%
471
+726%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−645%
298
+645%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−85.9%
158
+85.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−164%
120−130
+164%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−388%
160−170
+388%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−315%
110−120
+315%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−633%
132
+633%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−1040%
171
+1040%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−332%
80−85
+332%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−1310%
141
+1310%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−320%
80−85
+320%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−188%
270−280
+188%
Hitman 3 21−24
−462%
110−120
+462%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−837%
328
+837%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−356%
146
+356%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−959%
360
+959%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−1153%
238
+1153%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−129%
240−250
+129%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−328%
120−130
+328%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−418%
85−90
+418%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−431%
65−70
+431%
Hitman 3 12−14
−462%
70−75
+462%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−154%
220−230
+154%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−656%
130−140
+656%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−971%
182
+971%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−1000%
110
+1000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−1089%
107
+1089%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−478%
50−55
+478%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2267%
71
+2267%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−846%
227
+846%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−994%
197
+994%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−1371%
103
+1371%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−533%
95−100
+533%

This is how T1000 Max-Q and RX 7900 XTX compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900 XTX is 410% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900 XTX is 394% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7900 XTX is 405% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7900 XTX is 2267% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 7900 XTX surpassed T1000 Max-Q in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.35 80.52
Recency 27 May 2019 3 November 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 355 Watt

T1000 Max-Q has 610% lower power consumption.

RX 7900 XTX, on the other hand, has a 364.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7900 XTX is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1000 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 7900 XTX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Quadro T1000 Max-Q
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 17 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 3532 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.