Radeon RX 6500M vs Quadro T1000 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

T1000 Max-Q
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 35 Watt
17.39

Radeon RX 6500M outperforms Quadro T1000 Max-Q by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking293254
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)RDNA 2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameN19P-Q1Navi 24
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681024
Core clock speed795 / 1230 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1455 MHz2191 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 - 40 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate75.60153.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro T1000 Max-Q and Radeon RX 6500M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.21.2
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1000 Max-Q 17.39
RX 6500M 20.34
+17%

Radeon RX 6500M outperforms Quadro T1000 Max-Q by 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

T1000 Max-Q 6720
RX 6500M 7857
+16.9%

Radeon RX 6500M outperforms Quadro T1000 Max-Q by 17% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
−24%
62
+24%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−144%
66
+144%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−14.3%
40−45
+14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−114%
62
+114%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−17.5%
65−70
+17.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−17.1%
40−45
+17.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−148%
67
+148%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−14.6%
45−50
+14.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−14.9%
50−55
+14.9%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−13.6%
90−95
+13.6%
Hitman 3 30−35
−79.4%
61
+79.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−15.9%
80−85
+15.9%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−17.2%
65−70
+17.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−14.6%
55−60
+14.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−104%
114
+104%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−29.6%
70
+29.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−14.3%
40−45
+14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−55.2%
45
+55.2%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−17.5%
65−70
+17.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−17.1%
40−45
+17.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−18.5%
32
+18.5%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−14.6%
45−50
+14.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−14.9%
50−55
+14.9%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−13.6%
90−95
+13.6%
Hitman 3 30−35
−47.1%
50
+47.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−15.9%
80−85
+15.9%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−17.2%
65−70
+17.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−14.6%
55−60
+14.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−69.6%
95
+69.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−54.1%
57
+54.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−13%
60−65
+13%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−14.3%
40−45
+14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−34.5%
39
+34.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−17.1%
40−45
+17.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−7.4%
29
+7.4%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−14.6%
45−50
+14.6%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−13.6%
90−95
+13.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−15.9%
80−85
+15.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−48.2%
83
+48.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−5.4%
39
+5.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+116%
25
−116%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−14.6%
55−60
+14.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−14.7%
35−40
+14.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−24.2%
40−45
+24.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−26.7%
18−20
+26.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−18.2%
24−27
+18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−17.2%
30−35
+17.2%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%
Hitman 3 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−17.1%
40−45
+17.1%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−18.8%
35−40
+18.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−23.5%
40−45
+23.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−21.1%
21−24
+21.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−17.2%
30−35
+17.2%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−17.6%
20−22
+17.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%
Hitman 3 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−21.1%
21−24
+21.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−18.2%
12−14
+18.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−16.7%
27−30
+16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−21.1%
21−24
+21.1%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−18.8%
18−20
+18.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%

This is how T1000 Max-Q and RX 6500M compete in popular games:

  • RX 6500M is 24% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1000 Max-Q is 116% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6500M is 148% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1000 Max-Q is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • RX 6500M is ahead in 71 test (99%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.39 20.34
Recency 27 May 2019 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 50 Watt

The Radeon RX 6500M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1000 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6500M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Quadro T1000 Max-Q
AMD Radeon RX 6500M
Radeon RX 6500M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 17 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 461 vote

Rate Radeon RX 6500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.