GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile vs Quadro T1000 Max-Q

Place in the ranking	312	209
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	N19P-Q1	GN20-P0-R 6 GB
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)	6 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	2560
Core clock speed	795 / 1230 MHz	1237 MHz
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	1492 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 - 40 Watt	60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	75.60	no data
Floating-point processing power	2.419 gflops	no data
ROPs	32	no data
TMUs	56	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12_2
Shader Model	6.6	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	3.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2	-
CUDA	7.5	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	45−50 −53.3%	69 +53.3%
1440p	21−24 −66.7%	35 +66.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

27−30

−200%

81
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −41%	55−60 +41%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −48.3%	40−45 +48.3%
Battlefield 5	55−60 −43.9%	80−85 +43.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −45.7%	50−55 +45.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −137%	64 +137%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −41.5%	55−60 +41.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −38.3%	65−70 +38.3%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 −32.7%	140−150 +32.7%
Hitman 3	30−35 −54.5%	50−55 +54.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 −33.7%	110−120 +33.7%
Metro Exodus	60−65 −43.3%	85−90 +43.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −38.3%	65−70 +38.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 −49.1%	85−90 +49.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 −21.2%	100−110 +21.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −41%	55−60 +41%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −48.3%	40−45 +48.3%
Battlefield 5	55−60 −43.9%	80−85 +43.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −45.7%	50−55 +45.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −70.4%	46 +70.4%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −41.5%	55−60 +41.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −38.3%	65−70 +38.3%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 −32.7%	140−150 +32.7%
Hitman 3	30−35 −54.5%	50−55 +54.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 −33.7%	110−120 +33.7%
Metro Exodus	60−65 −43.3%	85−90 +43.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −38.3%	65−70 +38.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 −50.9%	86 +50.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 −35%	50−55 +35%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 −21.2%	100−110 +21.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −41%	55−60 +41%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −48.3%	40−45 +48.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −45.7%	50−55 +45.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −44.4%	39 +44.4%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −41.5%	55−60 +41.5%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 −32.7%	140−150 +32.7%
Hitman 3	30−35 −54.5%	50−55 +54.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 −33.7%	110−120 +33.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 −33.3%	76 +33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 −25%	50 +25%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 −21.2%	100−110 +21.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50

−38.3%

65−70
+38.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −41.2%	45−50 +41.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −40.7%	35−40 +40.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −44.4%	24−27 +44.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −66.7%	24−27 +66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −47.4%	27−30 +47.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −60%	16−18 +60%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −45%	27−30 +45%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 −53.2%	140−150 +53.2%
Hitman 3	21−24 −42.9%	30−33 +42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −48.6%	50−55 +48.6%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −50%	45−50 +50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −67.6%	57 +67.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −94.7%	37 +94.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 −34.3%	140−150 +34.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30

−44.8%

40−45
+44.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −47.1%	24−27 +47.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −53.8%	20−22 +53.8%
Hitman 3	12−14 −53.8%	20−22 +53.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 −44.9%	120−130 +44.9%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −55.6%	27−30 +55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −58.8%	27−30 +58.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −50%	14−16 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −44.4%	12−14 +44.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −41.7%	30−35 +41.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −72.2%	30−35 +72.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −57.1%	10−12 +57.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−46.7%

21−24
+46.7%

This is how T1000 Max-Q and RTX 3050 6GB Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 53% faster in 1080p
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 67% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX 3050 6GB Mobile surpassed T1000 Max-Q in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	17.38	25.57
Recency	27 May 2019	6 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	60 Watt

T1000 Max-Q has 71.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, on the other hand, has a 47.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1000 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.