NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600M

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in our rating
not rated
Value for money (0-100)
no data
GPU code name
Navi 23
Market segment
Mobile workstation
Release date
13 August 2018 (3 years ago)
8 June 2021 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
Price now
$4414 (0.4x MSRP)
no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores
Core clock speed
1395 MHz
no data
Boost clock speed
1770 MHz
2903 MHz
Number of transistors
18,600 million
11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
7 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)
260 Watt
90 Watt
Texture fill rate

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro RTX 8000 and Radeon Pro W6600M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x8
267 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin


Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type
Maximum RAM amount
48 GB
8 GB
Memory bus width
384 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
14000 MHz
14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
672.0 GB/s
224.0 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
No outputs

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

12 Ultimate (12_1)
12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model

Competitors of Quadro RTX 8000 from AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Quadro RTX 8000 from AMD is Radeon Pro W6800.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro RTX 8000:

Competitors of Radeon Pro W6600M from NVIDIA

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon Pro W6600M from NVIDIA is Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile.

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon Pro W6600M:

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

Wider memory bus (384 vs 128 bit)

More pipelines (4608 vs 1792)

Higher memory bandwidth (672 vs 224 GB/s)

Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6600M

Much newer (8 June 2021 vs 13 August 2018)

Finer manufacturing process technology (7 vs 12 nm)

Lower power consumption (90W vs 260W), meaning that the rival with higher TDP might require a better cooler or other thermal solution.

So, which one is the better GPU?

Technical City couldn't decide between NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 and AMD Radeon Pro W6600M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 8000 is a workstation card while Radeon Pro W6600M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
AMD Radeon Pro W6600M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.