Tesla PG500-216 vs Quadro RTX 6000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking65not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.24no data
Power efficiency12.93no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameTU102GV100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)26 November 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46085120
Core clock speed1440 MHz1260 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz1380 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate509.8441.6
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPS14.13 TFLOPS
ROPs96128
TMUs288320
Tensor Cores576640
Ray Tracing Cores72no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount24 GB32 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1106 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s1,133 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA7.57.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 August 2018 26 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 32 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 250 Watt

Tesla PG500-216 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 6000 and Tesla PG500-216. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000
NVIDIA Tesla PG500-216
Tesla PG500-216

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 129 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla PG500-216 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.