Mobility Radeon HD 4550 vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	113	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	8.13	no data
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Terascale 1 (2008−2010)
GPU code name	N19E-Q5	M92
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	27 May 2019 (4 years ago)	1 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Current price	$3065	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	80
Core clock speed	1035 / 1350 MHz	550 MHz
Boost clock speed	1545 / 1770 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	13,600 million	242 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 / 150 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	296.6	4.400
Floating-point performance	no data	88 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and Mobility Radeon HD 4550 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-II
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	700 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	11.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

+

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	6.5	4.1
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	7.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	27 May 2019	1 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	512 MB
Chip lithography	12 nm	55 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---