ATI Radeon IGP 340M vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1821605
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.80no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameTU104RS200
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (6 years ago)5 October 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30722
Core clock speed1035 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHz180 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Wattno data
Texture fill rate296.60.37
Floating-point processing power9.492 TFLOPSno data
ROPs642
TMUs1922
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores48no data
L1 Cache3 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)7.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD132no data
1440p84no data
4K54no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 180−190 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 0−1
Resident Evil 4 Remake 85−90 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 165 no data
Counter-Strike 2 180−190 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 0−1
Far Cry 5 128 no data
Fortnite 140−150 no data
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+6300%
2−3
−6300%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+2100%
6−7
−2100%
Valorant 200−210
+783%
21−24
−783%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 162 no data
Counter-Strike 2 180−190 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+2989%
9−10
−2989%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 0−1
Dota 2 98
+1300%
7−8
−1300%
Far Cry 5 123 no data
Fortnite 140−150 no data
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+6300%
2−3
−6300%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120 no data
Metro Exodus 99 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+2100%
6−7
−2100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 181
+4425%
4−5
−4425%
Valorant 200−210
+783%
21−24
−783%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 152 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 0−1
Dota 2 92
+1214%
7−8
−1214%
Far Cry 5 115 no data
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+6300%
2−3
−6300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+2100%
6−7
−2100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100
+2400%
4−5
−2400%
Valorant 181
+687%
21−24
−687%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 140−150 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+3800%
2−3
−3800%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70 no data
Metro Exodus 59 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 230−240 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 124 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 no data
Far Cry 5 102 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+5800%
1−2
−5800%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 85−90 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+386%
14−16
−386%
Metro Exodus 37 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71 no data
Valorant 200−210 0−1

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 73 no data
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Dota 2 100−105 no data
Far Cry 5 56 no data
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+4000%
1−2
−4000%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+3900%
1−2
−3900%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 5000 Mobile is 6300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 5000 Mobile surpassed ATI IGP 340M in all 19 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2019 5 October 2002
Chip lithography 12 nm 180 nm

RTX 5000 Mobile has an age advantage of 16 years, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and Radeon IGP 340M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon IGP 340M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 59 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 340M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile or Radeon IGP 340M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.