Radeon PRO V710 vs Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
4000 Mobile 4000 Max-Q 5000 Mobile 5000 Max-Q 5000 X2 Mobile
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q with Radeon PRO V710, including specs and performance data.

RTX 5000 Max-Q
2019
16 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
32.67

PRO V710 outperforms RTX 5000 Max-Q by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX 5000 Max-Q RTX 5000 Max-Q
PRO V710 PRO V710

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking190182
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency28.9614.81
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameTU104Navi 32
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)3 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30723456
Core clock speed600 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rate259.2432.0
Floating-point processing power8.294 TFLOPS27.65 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs192216
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores4854

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB28 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit224 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s504.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 5000 Max-Q 32.67
PRO V710 33.00
+1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 5000 Max-Q 12997
PRO V710 13129
+1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD106
+6%
100−110
−6%
1440p65
+0%
65−70
+0%
4K43
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+1.4%
70−75
−1.4%
Dead Island 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 131
+0.8%
130−140
−0.8%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+1.4%
70−75
−1.4%
Dead Island 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 106
+6%
100−105
−6%
Fortnite 140−150
+2.1%
140−150
−2.1%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+2.5%
120−130
−2.5%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
−1%
100−105
+1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+5%
120−130
−5%
Valorant 190−200
+3.2%
190−200
−3.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 120
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+2.2%
270−280
−2.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+1.4%
70−75
−1.4%
Dead Island 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Dota 2 122
+1.7%
120−130
−1.7%
Far Cry 5 101
+1%
100−105
−1%
Fortnite 140−150
+2.1%
140−150
−2.1%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+2.5%
120−130
−2.5%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
−1%
100−105
+1%
Grand Theft Auto V 108
+8%
100−105
−8%
Metro Exodus 73
+4.3%
70−75
−4.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+5%
120−130
−5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 145
+3.6%
140−150
−3.6%
Valorant 190−200
+3.2%
190−200
−3.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 112
+1.8%
110−120
−1.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+1.4%
70−75
−1.4%
Dead Island 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Dota 2 118
+7.3%
110−120
−7.3%
Far Cry 5 96
+1.1%
95−100
−1.1%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+2.5%
120−130
−2.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+5%
120−130
−5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 83
+3.8%
80−85
−3.8%
Valorant 141
+0.7%
140−150
−0.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+2.1%
140−150
−2.1%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
−0.5%
220−230
+0.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+1.7%
60−65
−1.7%
Metro Exodus 36
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+2.9%
170−180
−2.9%
Valorant 230−240
+1.3%
230−240
−1.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 91
+1.1%
90−95
−1.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Dead Island 2 60−65
+5%
60−65
−5%
Far Cry 5 74
+5.7%
70−75
−5.7%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dead Island 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 79
+5.3%
75−80
−5.3%
Metro Exodus 26
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 53
+6%
50−55
−6%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Dead Island 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Dota 2 99
−1%
100−105
+1%
Far Cry 5 40
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+3.6%
55−60
−3.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%

This is how RTX 5000 Max-Q and PRO V710 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Max-Q is 6% faster in 1080p
  • A tie in 1440p
  • RTX 5000 Max-Q is 8% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 32.67 33.00
Recency 27 May 2019 3 October 2024
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 28 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 158 Watt

RTX 5000 Max-Q has 97.5% lower power consumption.

PRO V710, on the other hand, has a 1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 75% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q and Radeon PRO V710.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 5000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
vs
RTX 4000 Mobile Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
PRO V710 Radeon PRO V710
vs
Pro VII Radeon Pro VII
RTX 5000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
vs
RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile
RTX 5000 Mobile NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile
vs
PRO V710 V710
RTX 4000 Mobile NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile
vs
PRO V710 V710
T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile
vs
PRO V710 V710
RX 5770 AMD RX 5770
vs
PRO V710 V710
Pro Vega II Duo AMD Pro Vega II Duo
vs
PRO V710 V710
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) Intel Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
vs
PRO V710 V710
RTX 6000 Mobile NVIDIA RTX 6000 Mobile
vs
PRO V710 V710
Pro 5300M AMD Pro 5300M
vs
PRO V710 V710
RX 5300 XT AMD RX 5300 XT
vs
PRO V710 V710
Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB NVIDIA V100S PCIe 32 GB
vs
PRO V710 V710

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 51 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q or Radeon PRO V710, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.