Radeon PRO V710 vs Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile with Radeon PRO V710, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4000 Mobile
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 110 Watt
32.93

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking184182
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.1914.78
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameTU104Navi 32
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)3 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25603456
Core clock speed1110 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rate249.6432.0
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPS27.65 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs160216
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores4054

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB28 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit224 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s504.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD107
+7%
100−110
−7%
1440p63
+5%
60−65
−5%
4K47
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0.6%
180−190
−0.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+2.9%
70−75
−2.9%
Dead Island 2 140−150
+0.7%
140−150
−0.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 101
+1%
100−105
−1%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0.6%
180−190
−0.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+2.9%
70−75
−2.9%
Dead Island 2 140−150
+0.7%
140−150
−0.7%
Far Cry 5 106
+6%
100−105
−6%
Fortnite 140−150
+2.9%
140−150
−2.9%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+3.3%
120−130
−3.3%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+5.8%
120−130
−5.8%
Valorant 190−200
+3.7%
190−200
−3.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 87
+2.4%
85−90
−2.4%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0.6%
180−190
−0.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+2.6%
270−280
−2.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+2.9%
70−75
−2.9%
Dead Island 2 140−150
+0.7%
140−150
−0.7%
Dota 2 132
+1.5%
130−140
−1.5%
Far Cry 5 100
+0%
100−105
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+2.9%
140−150
−2.9%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+3.3%
120−130
−3.3%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+4.3%
70−75
−4.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+5.8%
120−130
−5.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 143
+2.1%
140−150
−2.1%
Valorant 190−200
+3.7%
190−200
−3.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 81
+1.3%
80−85
−1.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+2.9%
70−75
−2.9%
Dead Island 2 140−150
+0.7%
140−150
−0.7%
Dota 2 127
+5.8%
120−130
−5.8%
Far Cry 5 96
+1.1%
95−100
−1.1%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+3.3%
120−130
−3.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+5.8%
120−130
−5.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+3.7%
190−200
−3.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+2.9%
140−150
−2.9%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+1.3%
75−80
−1.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+1.7%
60−65
−1.7%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+2.9%
170−180
−2.9%
Valorant 230−240
+1.7%
230−240
−1.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 66
+1.5%
65−70
−1.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Dead Island 2 60−65
+5%
60−65
−5%
Far Cry 5 69
+6.2%
65−70
−6.2%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+1.2%
85−90
−1.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+3.6%
55−60
−3.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dead Island 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+2%
50−55
−2%
Valorant 190−200
+1.1%
190−200
−1.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 42
+5%
40−45
−5%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Dead Island 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Dota 2 106
+6%
100−105
−6%
Far Cry 5 36
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+3.6%
55−60
−3.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%

This is how RTX 4000 Mobile and PRO V710 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 7% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 5% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 4% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.93 33.00
Recency 27 May 2019 3 October 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 28 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 158 Watt

RTX 4000 Mobile has 43.6% lower power consumption.

PRO V710, on the other hand, has a 0.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 250% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and Radeon PRO V710.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 36 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile or Radeon PRO V710, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.