T1200 Mobile vs Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad
Buy on Amazon

Aggregated performance score

RTX 4000 Mobile
2019
8 GB GDDR6
32.65
+63.9%

Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms T1200 Mobile by 64% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking156261
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation7.25no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameN19E-Q3no data
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (4 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price$2890 no data

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601024
Core clock speed1110 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate249.6no data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and T1200 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4000 Mobile 32.65
+63.9%
T1200 Mobile 19.92

Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms T1200 Mobile by 64% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 4000 Mobile 56250
+27.4%
T1200 Mobile 44135

Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms T1200 Mobile by 27% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 4000 Mobile 25371
+76.3%
T1200 Mobile 14387

Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms T1200 Mobile by 76% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 4000 Mobile 18849
+86%
T1200 Mobile 10134

Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms T1200 Mobile by 86% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 4000 Mobile 119052
+134%
T1200 Mobile 50827

Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms T1200 Mobile by 134% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD108
+83.1%
59
−83.1%
1440p63
+96.9%
32
−96.9%
4K47
−91.5%
90
+91.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+75%
30−35
−75%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 87
+112%
40−45
−112%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+21.3%
47
−21.3%
Battlefield 5 101
+50.7%
65−70
−50.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+69.2%
50−55
−69.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+75%
30−35
−75%
Far Cry 5 106
+63.1%
65
−63.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 103
+90.7%
50−55
−90.7%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+50.7%
65−70
−50.7%
Hitman 3 100−110
+75.9%
55−60
−75.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+16.7%
60
−16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+60.6%
30−35
−60.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 105
+78%
59
−78%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+14.8%
54
−14.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75
+82.9%
40−45
−82.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+104%
28
−104%
Battlefield 5 87
+29.9%
65−70
−29.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+69.2%
50−55
−69.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+75%
30−35
−75%
Far Cry 5 100
+69.5%
59
−69.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 101
+87%
50−55
−87%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+50.7%
65−70
−50.7%
Hitman 3 100−110
+75.9%
55−60
−75.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+48.9%
47
−48.9%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+78.1%
30−35
−78.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+60.6%
30−35
−60.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 83
+88.6%
44
−88.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 143
+101%
71
−101%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+31.9%
47
−31.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 54
+31.7%
40−45
−31.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+171%
21
−171%
Battlefield 5 81
+20.9%
65−70
−20.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+75%
30−35
−75%
Far Cry 5 96
+71.4%
56
−71.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 91
+68.5%
50−55
−68.5%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+50.7%
65−70
−50.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75
+103%
37
−103%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+226%
19
−226%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+73.3%
30−33
−73.3%
Hitman 3 55−60
+81.3%
30−35
−81.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+37.5%
32
−37.5%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+84.2%
18−20
−84.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+66.7%
14−16
−66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 57
+119%
24−27
−119%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 41
+95.2%
21−24
−95.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+94.4%
18
−94.4%
Battlefield 5 66
+50%
40−45
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
Far Cry 5 69
+68.3%
41
−68.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 77
+103%
35−40
−103%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+70%
40−45
−70%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+100%
21−24
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+133%
12
−133%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+86.7%
14−16
−86.7%
Hitman 3 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+76.9%
12−14
−76.9%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+100%
10−12
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+54.5%
10−12
−54.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30
+131%
12−14
−131%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+155%
20−22
−155%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 28
+133%
12−14
−133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
Battlefield 5 42
+82.6%
21−24
−82.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Far Cry 5 36
+125%
16−18
−125%
Far Cry New Dawn 43
+126%
18−20
−126%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+64.3%
27−30
−64.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%

This is how RTX 4000 Mobile and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 83.1% faster than T1200 Mobile in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 96.9% faster than T1200 Mobile in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 91.5% faster than RTX 4000 Mobile in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4000 Mobile is 226% faster than the T1200 Mobile.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4000 Mobile surpassed T1200 Mobile in all 68 of our tests.

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 32.65 19.92
Recency 27 May 2019 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 95 Watt

The Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the T1200 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
NVIDIA T1200 Mobile
T1200 Mobile

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 26 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.