Quadro 1000M vs Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and Quadro 1000M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 4000 Mobile
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 110 Watt
34.60
+2238%

RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms 1000M by a whopping 2238% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking147987
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.12
Power efficiency23.082.41
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameTU104GF108
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)13 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$174.95

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256096
Core clock speed1110 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate249.611.20
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPS0.2688 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs16016
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s28.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.52.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4000 Mobile 34.60
+2238%
Quadro 1000M 1.48

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 4000 Mobile 56250
+1132%
Quadro 1000M 4566

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 4000 Mobile 25371
+2590%
Quadro 1000M 943

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD113
+163%
43
−163%
1440p65
+3150%
2−3
−3150%
4K51
+2450%
2−3
−2450%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+1275%
4−5
−1275%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 87
+1350%
6−7
−1350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+2700%
2−3
−2700%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+2525%
4−5
−2525%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+1550%
4−5
−1550%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+1275%
4−5
−1275%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+3500%
2−3
−3500%
Far Cry New Dawn 125
+4067%
3−4
−4067%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+4200%
4−5
−4200%
Hitman 3 65−70
+1033%
6−7
−1033%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+840%
14−16
−840%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+2600%
4−5
−2600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+2567%
3−4
−2567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 180
+2150%
8−9
−2150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+258%
30−35
−258%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+1050%
6−7
−1050%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+2700%
2−3
−2700%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+2525%
4−5
−2525%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+1550%
4−5
−1550%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+1275%
4−5
−1275%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+3500%
2−3
−3500%
Far Cry New Dawn 90
+2900%
3−4
−2900%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+4200%
4−5
−4200%
Hitman 3 65−70
+1033%
6−7
−1033%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+840%
14−16
−840%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+2600%
4−5
−2600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+2567%
3−4
−2567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+1325%
8−9
−1325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+518%
10−12
−518%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+258%
30−35
−258%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 54
+800%
6−7
−800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+2700%
2−3
−2700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+1550%
4−5
−1550%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+1275%
4−5
−1275%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+3500%
2−3
−3500%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+4200%
4−5
−4200%
Hitman 3 65−70
+1033%
6−7
−1033%
Horizon Zero Dawn 121
+707%
14−16
−707%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+1325%
8−9
−1325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75
+582%
10−12
−582%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+258%
30−35
−258%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+2567%
3−4
−2567%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+2950%
2−3
−2950%
Far Cry New Dawn 60
+2900%
2−3
−2900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 41
+4000%
1−2
−4000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+1750%
2−3
−1750%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+2557%
7−8
−2557%
Hitman 3 40−45
+471%
7−8
−471%
Horizon Zero Dawn 89
+1680%
5−6
−1680%
Metro Exodus 77
+2467%
3−4
−2467%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
+2400%
3−4
−2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+4300%
1−2
−4300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 170−180
+2329%
7−8
−2329%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+1275%
4−5
−1275%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Far Cry New Dawn 33
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
Hitman 3 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+2550%
6−7
−2550%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+3800%
1−2
−3800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+2450%
2−3
−2450%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 28
+2700%
1−2
−2700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Far Cry 5 18−20 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+4300%
1−2
−4300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+4100%
1−2
−4100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+833%
3−4
−833%

This is how RTX 4000 Mobile and Quadro 1000M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 163% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 3150% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 2450% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4000 Mobile is 4300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4000 Mobile surpassed Quadro 1000M in all 49 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.60 1.48
Recency 27 May 2019 13 January 2011
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 45 Watt

RTX 4000 Mobile has a 2237.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro 1000M, on the other hand, has 144.4% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 1000M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
Quadro 1000M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 29 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 120 votes

Rate Quadro 1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.