AMD Radeon Pro VII vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

RTX 3000 Mobile
26.10

Radeon Pro VII outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 50% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking190103
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money6.1611.43
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)GCN 5.1 (2018−2021)
GPU code nameN19E-Q1Vega 20
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date27 May 2019 (4 years old)13 May 2020 (3 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,899
Current price$2393 $2378 (1.3x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro VII has 86% better value for money than RTX 3000 Mobile.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19203840
Core clock speed945 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1380 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million13,230 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate198.7408.0

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and Radeon Pro VII compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data305 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s1024 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs6x mini-DisplayPort
G-SYNC support+no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3000 Mobile 26.10
Pro VII 39.17
+50.1%

Radeon Pro VII outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 50% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 3000 Mobile 10116
Pro VII 15181
+50.1%

Radeon Pro VII outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by 50% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95
−47.4%
140−150
+47.4%
4K88
−47.7%
130−140
+47.7%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−39.5%
60−65
+39.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 77
−42.9%
110−120
+42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
−41.3%
65−70
+41.3%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−42.9%
120−130
+42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−44.9%
100−105
+44.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−39.5%
60−65
+39.5%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−47.1%
100−105
+47.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 91
−42.9%
130−140
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−39.5%
120−130
+39.5%
Hitman 3 75−80
−39.2%
110−120
+39.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−42.9%
80−85
+42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−42.9%
60−65
+42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100
−50%
150−160
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−50%
75−80
+50%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 62
−45.2%
90−95
+45.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
−41.3%
65−70
+41.3%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−42.9%
120−130
+42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−44.9%
100−105
+44.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−39.5%
60−65
+39.5%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−47.1%
100−105
+47.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 86
−39.5%
120−130
+39.5%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−39.5%
120−130
+39.5%
Hitman 3 75−80
−39.2%
110−120
+39.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−42.9%
80−85
+42.9%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−47.7%
65−70
+47.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−42.9%
60−65
+42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 84
−42.9%
120−130
+42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 109
−46.8%
160−170
+46.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−50%
75−80
+50%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 39
−41%
55−60
+41%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
−41.3%
65−70
+41.3%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−42.9%
120−130
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−39.5%
60−65
+39.5%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−47.1%
100−105
+47.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 77
−42.9%
110−120
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−39.5%
120−130
+39.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
−42.9%
80−85
+42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−50%
75−80
+50%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−50%
60−65
+50%
Hitman 3 40−45
−47.7%
65−70
+47.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−46.6%
85−90
+46.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−44.4%
65−70
+44.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−50%
75−80
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−48.1%
80−85
+48.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Hitman 3 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−48.6%
55−60
+48.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%

This is how RTX 3000 Mobile and Pro VII compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • Pro VII is 47.4% faster than RTX 3000 Mobile

4K resolution:

  • Pro VII is 47.7% faster than RTX 3000 Mobile

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 26.10 39.17
Recency 27 May 2019 13 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 250 Watt

The Radeon Pro VII is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon Pro VII is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
AMD Radeon Pro VII
Radeon Pro VII

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 219 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1536 votes

Rate AMD Radeon Pro VII on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.