GeForce MX450 vs Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q with GeForce MX450, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3000 Max-Q
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
21.62
+124%

RTX 3000 Max-Q outperforms GeForce MX450 by a whopping 124% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking236428
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameN19E-Q1 MAX-QN17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)1 August 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1920896
Core clock speed600 - 870 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed1215 - 1380 MHz1575 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 - 70 Watt25 Watt (12 - 29 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate175.0100.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q and GeForce MX450 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5, GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s64.03 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimusno data+
VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA7.57.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3000 Max-Q 21.62
+124%
GeForce MX450 9.67

Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q outperforms GeForce MX450 by 124% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 3000 Max-Q 8349
+124%
GeForce MX450 3733

Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q outperforms GeForce MX450 by 124% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 3000 Max-Q 17523
+112%
GeForce MX450 8250

Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q outperforms GeForce MX450 by 112% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 3000 Max-Q 13617
+188%
GeForce MX450 4725

Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q outperforms GeForce MX450 by 188% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 3000 Max-Q 66284
+140%
GeForce MX450 27570

Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q outperforms GeForce MX450 by 140% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75
+159%
29
−159%
1440p47
+176%
17
−176%
4K30
+25%
24
−25%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60 no data
Battlefield 5 70−75 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 no data
Far Cry 5 50−55 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 95−100 no data
Hitman 3 88 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90 no data
Metro Exodus 70−75 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 77 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 70 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50 no data
Battlefield 5 70−75 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 59 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 no data
Far Cry 5 50−55 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 95−100 no data
Hitman 3 62 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90 no data
Metro Exodus 70−75 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 72 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 97 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 44 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 no data
Far Cry 5 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 4 95−100 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 33 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 66 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 47 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 no data
Far Cry 5 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Hitman 3 24−27 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 40−45 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 47 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18 no data
Hitman 3 24 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 34 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 19 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−33 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27 no data
Metro Exodus 21−24 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 12 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24 no data

This is how RTX 3000 Max-Q and GeForce MX450 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3000 Max-Q is 159% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3000 Max-Q is 176% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3000 Max-Q is 25% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.62 9.67
Recency 27 May 2019 1 August 2020
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 25 Watt

The Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX450 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while GeForce MX450 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GeForce MX450

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 32 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1238 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.