Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs Quadro P620

Place in performance ranking	438	130
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	21.29	66.11
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code name	GP107	Vega 10
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)	19 March 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price	$170	$366

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro Vega 64X has 211% better value for money than Quadro P620.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	4096
Core clock speed	1177 MHz	1250 MHz
Boost clock speed	1442 MHz	1468 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	43.33	375.8
Floating-point performance	1,490 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P620 and Radeon Pro Vega 64X compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	145 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	2048 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80.13 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x mini-DisplayPort

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.125
CUDA	6.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P620 9.40

Pro Vega 64X 35.49
+278%

Radeon Pro Vega 64X outperforms Quadro P620 by 278% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P620 3632

Pro Vega 64X 13708
+277%

Radeon Pro Vega 64X outperforms Quadro P620 by 277% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Quadro P620 11838

Pro Vega 64X 75438
+537%

Radeon Pro Vega 64X outperforms Quadro P620 by 537% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−264%

200−210
+264%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

−267%

55−60
+267%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −268%	70−75 +268%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −257%	50−55 +257%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −245%	100−105 +245%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −268%	70−75 +268%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −267%	55−60 +267%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −264%	80−85 +264%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −265%	95−100 +265%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −270%	170−180 +270%
Hitman 3	18−20 −261%	65−70 +261%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −275%	150−160 +275%
Metro Exodus	35 −271%	130−140 +271%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −265%	95−100 +265%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −245%	100−105 +245%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −253%	120−130 +253%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −268%	70−75 +268%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −257%	50−55 +257%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −245%	100−105 +245%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −268%	70−75 +268%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −267%	55−60 +267%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −264%	80−85 +264%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −265%	95−100 +265%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −270%	170−180 +270%
Hitman 3	18−20 −261%	65−70 +261%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −275%	150−160 +275%
Metro Exodus	13 −246%	45−50 +246%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −265%	95−100 +265%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −245%	100−105 +245%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	32 −275%	120−130 +275%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −253%	120−130 +253%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −268%	70−75 +268%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −257%	50−55 +257%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −268%	70−75 +268%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −267%	55−60 +267%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −264%	80−85 +264%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −270%	170−180 +270%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −275%	150−160 +275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −245%	100−105 +245%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	17 −253%	60−65 +253%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −253%	120−130 +253%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27

−265%

95−100
+265%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −261%	65−70 +261%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −267%	55−60 +267%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −264%	40−45 +264%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −267%	55−60 +267%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −253%	60−65 +253%
Hitman 3	12−14 −246%	45−50 +246%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 −275%	75−80 +275%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −246%	45−50 +246%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −264%	40−45 +264%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

−275%

60−65
+275%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Hitman 3	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −250%	35−40 +250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −275%	45−50 +275%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −250%	35−40 +250%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −250%	35−40 +250%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%