RTX PRO 6000 vs Quadro P620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P620 and RTX PRO 6000, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro P620
2018
2 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
9.21

RTX PRO 6000 outperforms P620 by a whopping 785% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5059
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.359.65
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGP107GB202
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 February 2018 (7 years ago)2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51224064
Core clock speed1177 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speed1443 MHz2407 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate46.181,810
Floating-point processing power1.478 TFLOPS115.8 TFLOPS
ROPs16176
TMUs32752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length145 mm304 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount2 GB96 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA6.110.1
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P620 9.21
RTX PRO 6000 81.52
+785%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P620 3664
RTX PRO 6000 32435
+785%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD47
−751%
400−450
+751%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−751%
400−450
+751%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−733%
150−160
+733%
Dead Island 2 30−35
−771%
270−280
+771%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−669%
300−310
+669%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−751%
400−450
+751%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−733%
150−160
+733%
Dead Island 2 30−35
−771%
270−280
+771%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−762%
250−260
+762%
Fortnite 113
−785%
1000−1050
+785%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−669%
300−310
+669%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−752%
230−240
+752%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−775%
280−290
+775%
Valorant 85−90
−752%
750−800
+752%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−669%
300−310
+669%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−751%
400−450
+751%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
−776%
1200−1250
+776%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−733%
150−160
+733%
Dead Island 2 30−35
−771%
270−280
+771%
Dota 2 90
−733%
750−800
+733%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−762%
250−260
+762%
Fortnite 42
−733%
350−400
+733%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−669%
300−310
+669%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−752%
230−240
+752%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−779%
290−300
+779%
Metro Exodus 17
−782%
150−160
+782%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−775%
280−290
+775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
−775%
280−290
+775%
Valorant 85−90
−752%
750−800
+752%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−669%
300−310
+669%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−733%
150−160
+733%
Dead Island 2 30−35
−771%
270−280
+771%
Dota 2 83
−743%
700−750
+743%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−762%
250−260
+762%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−669%
300−310
+669%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−775%
280−290
+775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−782%
150−160
+782%
Valorant 85−90
−752%
750−800
+752%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 29
−762%
250−260
+762%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−775%
140−150
+775%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
−782%
600−650
+782%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−733%
100−105
+733%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−750%
85−90
+750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−695%
350−400
+695%
Valorant 100−110
−742%
850−900
+742%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−757%
180−190
+757%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
Dead Island 2 14−16
−767%
130−140
+767%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−733%
150−160
+733%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−757%
180−190
+757%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−746%
110−120
+746%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
−742%
160−170
+742%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Dead Island 2 10−11
−750%
85−90
+750%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−750%
170−180
+750%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−733%
75−80
+733%
Valorant 45−50
−770%
400−450
+770%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−750%
85−90
+750%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Dead Island 2 10−11
−750%
85−90
+750%
Dota 2 30−35
−779%
290−300
+779%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−733%
75−80
+733%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−767%
130−140
+767%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−775%
70−75
+775%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−775%
70−75
+775%

This is how Quadro P620 and RTX PRO 6000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 6000 is 751% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.21 81.52
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 96 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 600 Watt

Quadro P620 has 1400% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000, on the other hand, has a 785.1% higher aggregate performance score, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P620 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P620
Quadro P620
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000
RTX PRO 6000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 702 votes

Rate Quadro P620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 36 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P620 or RTX PRO 6000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.