GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs Quadro P6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P102-101 Quadro P6000 Tesla P10 Tesla P40
VS
RTX 4050 Max-Q RTX 4050 Mobile RTX 4060 Max-Q RTX 4060 Mobile RTX 4060 Ti Mobile RTX 4070 Max-Q RTX 4070 Mobile RTX 4080 Max-Q RTX 4080 Mobile RTX 4080 Ti Max-Q RTX 4080 Ti Mobile RTX 4090 Max-Q RTX 4090 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P6000 with GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P6000
2016
24 GB 384-bit, 250 Watt
39.93

RTX 4090 Mobile outperforms P6000 by an impressive 79% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
RTX 4090 Mobile RTX 4090

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11021
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.34no data
Power efficiency10.9840.98
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP102AD103
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2016 (8 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38409728
Core clock speed1506 MHz1335 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate394.8515.3
Floating-point processing power12.63 TFLOPS32.98 TFLOPS
ROPs96112
TMUs240304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type384 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1127 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 432 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Sync IIno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.18.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P6000 39.93
RTX 4090 Mobile 71.54
+79.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P6000 15386
RTX 4090 Mobile 27562
+79.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95−100
−86.3%
177
+86.3%
1440p70−75
−88.6%
132
+88.6%
4K45−50
−82.2%
82
+82.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080p63.15no data
1440p85.70no data
4K133.31no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 211
+0%
211
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220
+0%
220
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 147
+0%
147
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 174
+0%
174
+0%
Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 205
+0%
205
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 142
+0%
142
+0%
Far Cry 5 173
+0%
173
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 181
+0%
181
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 167
+0%
167
+0%
Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 132
+0%
132
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 133
+0%
133
+0%
Dota 2 199
+0%
199
+0%
Far Cry 5 167
+0%
167
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 174
+0%
174
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 162
+0%
162
+0%
Metro Exodus 156
+0%
156
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 394
+0%
394
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 149
+0%
149
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 128
+0%
128
+0%
Dota 2 187
+0%
187
+0%
Far Cry 5 158
+0%
158
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 204
+0%
204
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 516
+0%
516
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 138
+0%
138
+0%
Metro Exodus 117
+0%
117
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 485
+0%
485
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60
+0%
60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95
+0%
95
+0%
Far Cry 5 151
+0%
151
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 164
+0%
164
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 63
+0%
63
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 314
+0%
314
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 172
+0%
172
+0%
Metro Exodus 82
+0%
82
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150
+0%
150
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 48
+0%
48
+0%
Dota 2 179
+0%
179
+0%
Far Cry 5 107
+0%
107
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how Quadro P6000 and RTX 4090 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 86% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 89% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 82% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 39.93 71.54
Recency 1 October 2016 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 120 Watt

Quadro P6000 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 4090 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 79.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 108.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P6000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4090
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Pro W6600 Radeon Pro W6600
RTX 4090 Mobile GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
vs
RTX 5090 Mobile GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
Quadro P600 Quadro P600
vs
R9 380 OEM Radeon R9 380 OEM
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2000
vs
GTX 770M GeForce GTX 770M
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2000
vs
HD 7660D Radeon HD 7660D
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2000
vs
S7150 x2 FirePro S7150 x2
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2000
vs
ATI HD 3650 Radeon HD 3650
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
RTX 3060 3840SP GeForce RTX 3060 3840SP
Tesla P4 Tesla P4
vs
GTX 1630 GeForce GTX 1630
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
vs
FirePro M5950 FirePro M5950
Tesla M40 Tesla M40
vs
Pro 5500M Radeon Pro 5500M
Tesla M40 Tesla M40
vs
CMP 170HX CMP 170HX

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 95 votes

Rate Quadro P6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 711 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P6000 or GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.