GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs Quadro P6000

Place in the ranking	107	32
Place by popularity	not in top-100	88
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.15	52.68
Power efficiency	11.04	14.55
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GP102	GA104
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 October 2016 (8 years ago)	31 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$5,999	$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3070 Ti has 1169% better value for money than Quadro P6000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3840	6144
Core clock speed	1506 MHz	1575 MHz
Boost clock speed	1645 MHz	1770 MHz
Number of transistors	11,800 million	17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	290 Watt
Texture fill rate	394.8	339.8
Floating-point processing power	12.63 TFLOPS	21.75 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	96
TMUs	240	192
Tensor Cores	no data	192
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	2" (5.1 cm)	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 8-pin	1x 12-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	384 Bit	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1127 MHz	1188 MHz
Memory bandwidth	Up to 432 GB/s	608.3 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displays	4	no data
Multi-display synchronization	Quadro Sync II	no data
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)	+	no data
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
High-Performance Video I/O6	+	no data
nView Desktop Management	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	6.1	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P6000 40.00

RTX 3070 Ti 61.14
+52.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P6000 15381

RTX 3070 Ti 23509
+52.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	110−120 −60%	176 +60%
1440p	60−65 −56.7%	94 +56.7%
4K	40−45 −55%	62 +55%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	54.54 −1502%	3.40 +1502%
1440p	99.98 −1469%	6.37 +1469%
4K	149.98 −1452%	9.66 +1452%

RTX 3070 Ti has 1502% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RTX 3070 Ti has 1469% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RTX 3070 Ti has 1452% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	193 +0%	193 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	174 +0%	174 +0%
Elden Ring	195 +0%	195 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	152 +0%	152 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	69 +0%	69 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	398 +0%	398 +0%
Metro Exodus	173 +0%	173 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Valorant	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	131 +0%	131 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	61 +0%	61 +0%
Dota 2	198 +0%	198 +0%
Elden Ring	230−240 +0%	230−240 +0%
Far Cry 5	162 +0%	162 +0%
Fortnite	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	316 +0%	316 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	173 +0%	173 +0%
Metro Exodus	138 +0%	138 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Valorant	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	114 +0%	114 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	56 +0%	56 +0%
Dota 2	230 +0%	230 +0%
Far Cry 5	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	274 +0%	274 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Valorant	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	137 +0%	137 +0%
Elden Ring	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	137 +0%	137 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
World of Tanks	400−450 +0%	400−450 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	71 +0%	71 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	36 +0%	36 +0%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	205 +0%	205 +0%
Metro Exodus	135 +0%	135 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Valorant	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	47 +0%	47 +0%
Dota 2	147 +0%	147 +0%
Elden Ring	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	147 +0%	147 +0%
Metro Exodus	56 +0%	56 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	147 +0%	147 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18 +0%	18 +0%
Dota 2	194 +0%	194 +0%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Fortnite	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	119 +0%	119 +0%
Valorant	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%

This is how Quadro P6000 and RTX 3070 Ti compete in popular games:

RTX 3070 Ti is 60% faster in 1080p
RTX 3070 Ti is 57% faster in 1440p
RTX 3070 Ti is 55% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	40.00	61.14
Recency	1 October 2016	31 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	290 Watt

Quadro P6000 has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 16% lower power consumption.

RTX 3070 Ti, on the other hand, has a 52.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P6000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.