GeForce GTX 1070 Ti vs Quadro P6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P6000 with GeForce GTX 1070 Ti, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P6000
2016
24 GB 384-bit, 250 Watt
38.62
+5.1%

P6000 outperforms GTX 1070 Ti by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking106122
Place by popularitynot in top-10070
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.1829.71
Power efficiency11.0614.61
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP102GP104
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 October 2016 (8 years ago)2 November 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 $399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1070 Ti has 611% better value for money than Quadro P6000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38402432
Core clock speed1506 MHz1607 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz1683 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate394.8255.8
Floating-point processing power12.63 TFLOPS8.186 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs240152

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2" (5.1 cm)2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 8-pin1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type384 BitGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount24 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1127 MHz2002 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 432 GB/s256.3 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Sync IIno data
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
VR Readyno data+
nView Desktop Management+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.16.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P6000 38.62
+5.1%
GTX 1070 Ti 36.75

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P6000 15435
+5.1%
GTX 1070 Ti 14687

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro P6000 64167
+15.9%
GTX 1070 Ti 55354

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Quadro P6000 77990
+27.5%
GTX 1070 Ti 61154

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Quadro P6000 47462
GTX 1070 Ti 49727
+4.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120
+0.9%
109
−0.9%
1440p70−75
−1.4%
71
+1.4%
4K55−60
+0%
55
+0%

Cost per frame, $

1080p54.54
−1390%
3.66
+1390%
1440p85.70
−1425%
5.62
+1425%
4K109.07
−1404%
7.25
+1404%
  • GTX 1070 Ti has 1390% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 Ti has 1425% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1070 Ti has 1404% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 107
+0%
107
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Dota 2 42
+0%
42
+0%
Far Cry 5 75
+0%
75
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 78
+0%
78
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 112
+0%
112
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Dota 2 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
World of Tanks 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 76
+0%
76
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Dota 2 67
+0%
67
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 67
+0%
67
+0%
Metro Exodus 25
+0%
25
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 92
+0%
92
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 67
+0%
67
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 105
+0%
105
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Fortnite 45
+0%
45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

This is how Quadro P6000 and GTX 1070 Ti compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P6000 is 1% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 Ti is 1% faster in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.62 36.75
Recency 1 October 2016 2 November 2017
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 180 Watt

Quadro P6000 has a 5.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1070 Ti, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 38.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro P6000 and GeForce GTX 1070 Ti.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 91 vote

Rate Quadro P6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 3902 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.