GeForce GTX 1070 vs Quadro P6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P6000 with GeForce GTX 1070, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P6000
2016
24 GB 384-bit, 250 Watt
39.65
+14.3%

P6000 outperforms GTX 1070 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking107146
Place by popularitynot in top-10026
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.2423.35
Power efficiency11.0616.13
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP102GP104
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 October 2016 (8 years ago)10 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 $379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1070 has 451% better value for money than Quadro P6000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38401920
Core clock speed1506 MHz1506 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz1683 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt150 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data94 °C
Texture fill rate394.8202.0
Floating-point processing power12.63 TFLOPS6.463 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs240120

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width2" (5.1 cm)2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)no data500 Watt
Supplementary power connectors1 x 8-pin1x 8-pin
SLI options++

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type384 BitGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount24 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1127 MHz8 GB/s
Memory bandwidthUp to 432 GB/s256 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Sync IIno data
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boostno data3.0
ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
VR Readyno data+
nView Desktop Management+no data
Anselno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDA6.1+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P6000 39.65
+14.3%
GTX 1070 34.70

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P6000 15435
+14.3%
GTX 1070 13507

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro P6000 64167
+35.3%
GTX 1070 47421

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Quadro P6000 77990
+61.7%
GTX 1070 48244

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Quadro P6000 47462
+4.8%
GTX 1070 45301

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
+13%
115
−13%
1440p75−80
+11.9%
67
−11.9%
4K55−60
+10%
50
−10%

Cost per frame, $

1080p46.15
−1300%
3.30
+1300%
1440p79.99
−1314%
5.66
+1314%
4K109.07
−1339%
7.58
+1339%
  • GTX 1070 has 1300% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 has 1314% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1070 has 1339% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 87
+0%
87
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Metro Exodus 107
+0%
107
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 115
+0%
115
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 156
+0%
156
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 74
+0%
74
+0%
Far Cry 5 75
+0%
75
+0%
Fortnite 150
+0%
150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 111
+0%
111
+0%
Metro Exodus 75
+0%
75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 225
+0%
225
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 43
+0%
43
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
+0%
52
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 74
+0%
74
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 94
+0%
94
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
World of Tanks 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 67
+0%
67
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 71
+0%
71
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Dota 2 62
+0%
62
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 62
+0%
62
+0%
Metro Exodus 23
+0%
23
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95
+0%
95
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18
+0%
18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+0%
62
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 37
+0%
37
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Dota 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Fortnite 44
+0%
44
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

This is how Quadro P6000 and GTX 1070 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P6000 is 13% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P6000 is 12% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P6000 is 10% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.65 34.70
Recency 1 October 2016 10 June 2016
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 150 Watt

Quadro P6000 has a 14.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1070, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1070 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1070 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 91 vote

Rate Quadro P6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 8825 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.