Radeon RX 6600M vs Quadro P600

Place in performance ranking	465	139
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	9.25	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	RDNA 2 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GP107	R21M-E65-70
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	14 November 2017 (6 years ago)	1 September 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$178	no data
Current price	$207 (1.2x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	1792
Core clock speed	1430 MHz	2068 MHz
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz	2177 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	100 Watt (50 - 100 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	37.37	235.8
Floating-point performance	1,117 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P600 and Radeon RX 6600M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	145 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64.13 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x mini-DisplayPort

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	6.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P600 8.45

RX 6600M 35.23
+317%

Radeon RX 6600M outperforms Quadro P600 by 317% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P600 3270

RX 6600M 13631
+317%

Radeon RX 6600M outperforms Quadro P600 by 317% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro P600 4655

RX 6600M 31868
+585%

Radeon RX 6600M outperforms Quadro P600 by 585% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro P600 4083

RX 6600M 23525
+476%

Radeon RX 6600M outperforms Quadro P600 by 476% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro P600 28957

RX 6600M 144612
+399%

Radeon RX 6600M outperforms Quadro P600 by 399% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

Quadro P600 243785

RX 6600M 479404
+96.7%

Radeon RX 6600M outperforms Quadro P600 by 97% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P600 37

RX 6600M 159
+326%

Radeon RX 6600M outperforms Quadro P600 by 326% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P600 68

RX 6600M 180
+163%

Radeon RX 6600M outperforms Quadro P600 by 163% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P600 38

RX 6600M 164
+335%

Radeon RX 6600M outperforms Quadro P600 by 335% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P600 40

RX 6600M 207
+420%

Radeon RX 6600M outperforms Quadro P600 by 420% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P600 42

RX 6600M 102
+145%

Radeon RX 6600M outperforms Quadro P600 by 145% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P600 13

RX 6600M 96
+663%

Radeon RX 6600M outperforms Quadro P600 by 663% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P600 3

RX 6600M 30
+852%

Radeon RX 6600M outperforms Quadro P600 by 852% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	37 −170%	100 +170%
1440p	12−14 −358%	55 +358%
4K	7−8 −329%	30 +329%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

12−14

−746%

110
+746%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −535%	108 +535%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −692%	95 +692%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −275%	100−110 +275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −313%	95−100 +313%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −592%	90 +592%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −452%	116 +452%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −355%	100 +355%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −597%	202 +597%
Hitman 3	21−24 −633%	154 +633%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −629%	124 +629%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −280%	55−60 +280%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −567%	120 +567%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −757%	120 +757%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −524%	106 +524%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −558%	79 +558%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −275%	100−110 +275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −313%	95−100 +313%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −454%	72 +454%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −414%	108 +414%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −336%	96 +336%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −586%	199 +586%
Hitman 3	21−24 −586%	144 +586%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −476%	98 +476%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −567%	80 +567%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −280%	55−60 +280%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −511%	110 +511%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	25 −468%	142 +468%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −664%	107 +664%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −365%	79 +365%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −475%	69 +475%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −275%	100−110 +275%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −369%	61 +369%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −381%	101 +381%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −305%	89 +305%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −479%	168 +479%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14 −507%	85 +507%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −321%	59 +321%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −375%	55−60 +375%
Hitman 3	12−14 −392%	60−65 +392%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −371%	66 +371%
Metro Exodus	7−8 −571%	47 +571%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −367%	27−30 +367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −509%	67 +509%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −629%	51 +629%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −1200%	52 +1200%
Battlefield 5	12−14 −525%	75−80 +525%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −800%	36 +800%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −592%	90 +592%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −554%	85 +554%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −814%	128 +814%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −675%	62 +675%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −1300%	42 +1300%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −417%	30−35 +417%
Hitman 3	8−9 −338%	35−40 +338%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −113%	17 +113%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −1300%	28 +1300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −375%	18−20 +375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −675%	31 +675%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −633%	44 +633%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −480%	29 +480%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −800%	27 +800%
Battlefield 5	6−7 −617%	40−45 +617%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1300%	14 +1300%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −529%	44 +529%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −433%	48 +433%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −640%	74 +640%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −950%	21 +950%

This is how Quadro P600 and RX 6600M compete in popular games:

RX 6600M is 170% faster in 1080p
RX 6600M is 358% faster in 1440p
RX 6600M is 329% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6600M is 1300% faster than the Quadro P600.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 6600M surpassed Quadro P600 in all 68 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.45	35.23
Recency	14 November 2017	1 September 2020
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	100 Watt