Radeon RX 5700 vs Quadro P600

Place in performance ranking	467	115
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	9.33	80.03
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code name	GP107	Navi 10
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	14 November 2017 (6 years ago)	7 July 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$178	$349
Current price	$207 (1.2x MSRP)	$116 (0.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5700 has 758% better value for money than Quadro P600.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	2304
Core clock speed	1430 MHz	1465 MHz
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz	1725 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	180 Watt
Texture fill rate	37.37	248.4
Floating-point performance	1,117 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	145 mm	268 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64.13 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	6.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P600 8.47

RX 5700 37.50
+343%

Radeon RX 5700 outperforms Quadro P600 by 343% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P600 3272

RX 5700 14482
+343%

Radeon RX 5700 outperforms Quadro P600 by 343% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro P600 4655

RX 5700 31470
+576%

Radeon RX 5700 outperforms Quadro P600 by 576% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro P600 4083

RX 5700 23746
+482%

Radeon RX 5700 outperforms Quadro P600 by 482% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro P600 28957

RX 5700 132911
+359%

Radeon RX 5700 outperforms Quadro P600 by 359% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Quadro P600 10545

RX 5700 68857
+553%

Radeon RX 5700 outperforms Quadro P600 by 553% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

Quadro P600 243785

RX 5700 489113
+101%

Radeon RX 5700 outperforms Quadro P600 by 101% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Quadro P600 9721

RX 5700 62909
+547%

Radeon RX 5700 outperforms Quadro P600 by 547% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P600 37

RX 5700 116
+211%

Radeon RX 5700 outperforms Quadro P600 by 211% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P600 68

RX 5700 106
+55%

Radeon RX 5700 outperforms Quadro P600 by 55% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P600 38

RX 5700 42
+11.7%

Radeon RX 5700 outperforms Quadro P600 by 12% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P600 40

RX 5700 162
+307%

Radeon RX 5700 outperforms Quadro P600 by 307% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P600 42

RX 5700 78
+87.8%

Radeon RX 5700 outperforms Quadro P600 by 88% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P600 13

RX 5700 43
+238%

Radeon RX 5700 outperforms Quadro P600 by 238% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P600 3

RX 5700 12
+287%

Radeon RX 5700 outperforms Quadro P600 by 287% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro P600 40

RX 5700 136
+241%

Radeon RX 5700 outperforms Quadro P600 by 241% in SPECviewperf 12 - Catia.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	43 −163%	113 +163%
1440p	14−16 −379%	67 +379%
4K	9−10 −378%	43 +378%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

12−14

−546%

84
+546%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −328%	77 +328%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −708%	97 +708%
Battlefield 5	24−27 −592%	180 +592%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −500%	102 +500%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −477%	75 +477%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −489%	112 +489%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −313%	99 +313%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −222%	132 +222%
Hitman 3	16−18 −375%	76 +375%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −495%	220 +495%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −476%	144 +476%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −371%	113 +371%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −723%	214 +723%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −238%	108 +238%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −294%	71 +294%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −567%	80 +567%
Battlefield 5	24−27 −458%	145 +458%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −441%	92 +441%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −415%	67 +415%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −374%	90 +374%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −275%	90 +275%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −573%	276 +573%
Hitman 3	16−18 −381%	77 +381%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −686%	291 +686%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −460%	140 +460%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −367%	112 +367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −573%	175 +573%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	25 −488%	147 +488%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −659%	243 +659%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −233%	60 +233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −542%	77 +542%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −300%	68 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −346%	58 +346%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −237%	64 +237%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −188%	118 +188%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −222%	119 +222%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −496%	155 +496%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14 −550%	91 +550%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −81.3%	58 +81.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27

−325%

102
+325%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −538%	102 +538%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −700%	104 +700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −538%	51 +538%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −1225%	53 +1225%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −640%	74 +640%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −800%	36 +800%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −615%	93 +615%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −587%	103 +587%
Hitman 3	12−14 −358%	55 +358%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −417%	93 +417%
Metro Exodus	10−12 −755%	94 +755%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −1100%	108 +1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −575%	50−55 +575%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −850%	38 +850%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−400%

70
+400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −563%	53 +563%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −550%	39 +550%
Hitman 3	5−6 −680%	39 +680%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −422%	45−50 +422%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −825%	37 +825%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −700%	48 +700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −520%	31 +520%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −675%	31 +675%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −550%	26 +550%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1400%	15 +1400%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −550%	26 +550%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −600%	70 +600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −511%	55 +511%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −456%	50 +456%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −267%	11 +267%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9

−338%

35
+338%

This is how Quadro P600 and RX 5700 compete in popular games:

RX 5700 is 163% faster in 1080p
RX 5700 is 379% faster in 1440p
RX 5700 is 378% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 5700 is 1400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 5700 surpassed Quadro P600 in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.47	37.50
Recency	14 November 2017	7 July 2019
Cost	$178	$349
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	180 Watt