Quadro M600M vs M2000

Place in performance ranking	407	567
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.30	3.40
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)	Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code name	GM206	GM107
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	8 April 2016 (8 years ago)	2 October 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$437.75	no data
Current price	$285 (0.7x MSRP)	$103

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro M2000 has 26% better value for money than Quadro M600M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	384
Core clock speed	796 MHz	837 MHz
Boost clock speed	1163 MHz	876 MHz
Number of transistors	2,940 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	30 Watt
Texture fill rate	55.82	14.02
Floating-point performance	1,812 gflops	863.2 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M2000 and Quadro M600M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Length	201 mm	no data
Width	1" (2.5 cm)	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	128 Bit	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6612 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	Up to 106 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DP DP DP DP	No outputs
Number of simultaneous displays	4	no data
Display Port	no data	1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	no data	+
3D Vision Pro	+	+
Mosaic	+	+
nView Display Management	no data	+
nView Desktop Management	+	no data
Optimus	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12
Shader Model	5	5.0
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	+
CUDA	5.2	5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M2000 10.32
+83%

Quadro M600M 5.64

M2000 outperforms M600M by 83% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro M2000 3984
+83%

Quadro M600M 2177

M2000 outperforms M600M by 83% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Quadro M2000 14081
+141%

Quadro M600M 5832

M2000 outperforms M600M by 141% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

27−30
+80%

−80%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

9−10
+125%

4−5

−125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +87.5%	8−9 −87.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +100%	8−9 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +92.9%	14−16 −92.9%
Hitman 3	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +100%	14−16 −100%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +87.5%	8−9 −87.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 +90%	10−11 −90%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +100%	12−14 −100%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +87.5%	8−9 −87.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +100%	8−9 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +92.9%	14−16 −92.9%
Hitman 3	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +100%	14−16 −100%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +87.5%	8−9 −87.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 +90%	10−11 −90%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14 +100%	7−8 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +100%	12−14 −100%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +92.9%	14−16 −92.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +100%	14−16 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 +90%	10−11 −90%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8 +100%	4−5 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +100%	12−14 −100%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

+87.5%

8−9
−87.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%
Hitman 3	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

+100%

5−6
−100%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Hitman 3	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%