Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Quadro P5200

Place in performance ranking	163	75
Place by popularity	not in top-100	61
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.41	100.00
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code name	GP104	Navi 10
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	11 January 2017 (7 years ago)	7 July 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399
Current price	$3894	$111 (0.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5700 XT has 2833% better value for money than Quadro P5200.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	2560
Core clock speed	1316 MHz	1605 MHz
Boost clock speed	1569 MHz	1905 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	279.4	304.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P5200 and Radeon RX 5700 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	272 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7216 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	230.4 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
VR Ready	no data	+
Multi Monitor	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	+
CUDA	6.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P5200 31.78

RX 5700 XT 43.05
+35.5%

Radeon RX 5700 XT outperforms Quadro P5200 by 35% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P5200 12286

RX 5700 XT 16642
+35.5%

Radeon RX 5700 XT outperforms Quadro P5200 by 35% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro P5200 25100

RX 5700 XT 35823
+42.7%

Radeon RX 5700 XT outperforms Quadro P5200 by 43% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro P5200 65844

RX 5700 XT 83961
+27.5%

Radeon RX 5700 XT outperforms Quadro P5200 by 28% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro P5200 18467

RX 5700 XT 26189
+41.8%

Radeon RX 5700 XT outperforms Quadro P5200 by 42% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro P5200 106328

RX 5700 XT 146093
+37.4%

Radeon RX 5700 XT outperforms Quadro P5200 by 37% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P5200 146
+26.7%

RX 5700 XT 115

Quadro P5200 outperforms Radeon RX 5700 XT by 27% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P5200 206
+87.2%

RX 5700 XT 110

Quadro P5200 outperforms Radeon RX 5700 XT by 87% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P5200 216
+401%

RX 5700 XT 43

Quadro P5200 outperforms Radeon RX 5700 XT by 401% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P5200 193
+10.7%

RX 5700 XT 174

Quadro P5200 outperforms Radeon RX 5700 XT by 11% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P5200 156
+92.8%

RX 5700 XT 81

Quadro P5200 outperforms Radeon RX 5700 XT by 93% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P5200 79
+69.1%

RX 5700 XT 47

Quadro P5200 outperforms Radeon RX 5700 XT by 69% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P5200 75

RX 5700 XT 141
+87.3%

Radeon RX 5700 XT outperforms Quadro P5200 by 87% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro P5200 75

RX 5700 XT 138
+83%

Radeon RX 5700 XT outperforms Quadro P5200 by 83% in SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase.

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro P5200 193
+21.3%

RX 5700 XT 159

Quadro P5200 outperforms Radeon RX 5700 XT by 21% in SPECviewperf 12 - Catia.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	124 +1.6%	122 −1.6%
1440p	55−60 −40%	77 +40%
4K	58 +16%	50 −16%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

50−55

−44.4%

78
+44.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −28.8%	76 +28.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 −100%	110 +100%
Battlefield 5	100−110 −93.2%	199 +93.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 −68.6%	118 +68.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 −44.4%	78 +44.4%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −78.6%	125 +78.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 −42.2%	118 +42.2%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 −58.2%	155 +58.2%
Hitman 3	75−80 −118%	172 +118%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −118%	249 +118%
Metro Exodus	85−90 −65.5%	144 +65.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 −42%	115 +42%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−110 −127%	234 +127%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −105%	121 +105%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −18.6%	70 +18.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 −65.5%	91 +65.5%
Battlefield 5	100−110 −60.2%	165 +60.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 −82.9%	128 +82.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 −38.9%	75 +38.9%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +22.8%	57 −22.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 −54.2%	128 +54.2%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 −57.1%	154 +57.1%
Hitman 3	75−80 −12.7%	89 +12.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −77.2%	202 +77.2%
Metro Exodus	85−90 −71.3%	149 +71.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 −42%	115 +42%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	36 −328%	154 +328%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	118 −30.5%	154 +30.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −79.7%	106 +79.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −5.1%	62 +5.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 −41.8%	78 +41.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 −14.3%	80 +14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 −24.1%	67 +24.1%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −4.3%	73 +4.3%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 −51%	148 +51%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −18.4%	135 +18.4%
Metro Exodus	85−90 −11.5%	97 +11.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65 −43.1%	93 +43.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −13.6%	67 +13.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

80−85

−33.3%

108
+33.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −110%	126 +110%
Far Cry New Dawn	70−75 −62.5%	117 +62.5%
Hitman 3	40−45 −65.9%	73 +65.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −68%	42 +68%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −51.4%	53 +51.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 −73.5%	59 +73.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −69.6%	78 +69.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −73.9%	40 +73.9%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −73.2%	97 +73.2%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −83.1%	119 +83.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −55.2%	104 +55.2%
Metro Exodus	60−65 −73.3%	104 +73.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 −60.8%	119 +60.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 −52.4%	60−65 +52.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 −76.9%	46 +76.9%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	50−55 +22.7%	44 −22.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −66.7%	65 +66.7%
Hitman 3	24−27 −73.1%	45 +73.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −47.4%	55−60 +47.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	26 −50%	39 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	46 −17.4%	54 +17.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −66.7%	35 +66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −73.7%	33 +73.7%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −57.9%	60 +57.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −71.4%	48 +71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −88.9%	17 +88.9%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −79.5%	79 +79.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −65.8%	63 +65.8%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −75%	56 +75%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 +15.4%	13 −15.4%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30

−42.9%

40
+42.9%

This is how Quadro P5200 and RX 5700 XT compete in popular games:

Quadro P5200 is 2% faster in 1080p
RX 5700 XT is 40% faster in 1440p
Quadro P5200 is 16% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P5200 is 23% faster than the RX 5700 XT.
in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 5700 XT is 328% faster than the Quadro P5200.

All in all, in popular games:

Quadro P5200 is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
RX 5700 XT is ahead in 69 tests (96%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	31.78	43.05
Recency	11 January 2017	7 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	225 Watt