Radeon Pro WX 4130 vs Quadro P5200

Place in performance ranking	163	591
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.52	0.30
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Polaris (2016−2019)
GPU code name	GP104	Polaris
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	11 January 2017 (7 years ago)	1 March 2017 (7 years ago)
Current price	$3894	$2000

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P5200 has 1073% better value for money than Pro WX 4130.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	640
Core clock speed	1316 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1569 MHz	1053 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	279.4	42.12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P5200 and Radeon Pro WX 4130 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7216 MHz	7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	230.4 GB/s	96 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	no data	+
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	6.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P5200 31.86
+526%

Pro WX 4130 5.09

Quadro P5200 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 4130 by 526% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P5200 12304
+526%

Pro WX 4130 1966

Quadro P5200 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 4130 by 526% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	130 +622%	18−21 −622%
4K	60 +567%	9−10 −567%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

50−55

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60	no data
Battlefield 5	100−110	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55	no data
Far Cry 5	70−75	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85	no data
Forza Horizon 4	120−130	no data
Hitman 3	65−70	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130	no data
Metro Exodus	95−100	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60	no data
Battlefield 5	100−110	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55	no data
Far Cry 5	70−75	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85	no data
Forza Horizon 4	120−130	no data
Hitman 3	65−70	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130	no data
Metro Exodus	95−100	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	118	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55	no data
Far Cry 5	70−75	no data
Forza Horizon 4	120−130	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

80−85

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	70−75	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +580%	5−6 −580%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24	no data
Far Cry 5	55−60	no data
Forza Horizon 4	65−70	no data
Hitman 3	40−45	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70	no data
Metro Exodus	60−65	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 +640%	10−11 −640%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27	no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27	no data
Hitman 3	24−27	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	26	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	46	no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10	no data
Far Cry 5	18−20	no data
Forza Horizon 4	40−45	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40	no data
Metro Exodus	30−35	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16	no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30

no data

This is how Quadro P5200 and Pro WX 4130 compete in popular games:

Quadro P5200 is 622% faster in 1080p
Quadro P5200 is 567% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	31.86	5.09
Recency	11 January 2017	1 March 2017
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	50 Watt