ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs Quadro P5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5200 with Radeon HD 4250, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P5200
2018
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
31.50
+9744%

P5200 outperforms ATI HD 4250 by a whopping 9744% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1761311
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.590.88
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGP104RV620
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)25 February 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256040
Core clock speed1556 MHz594 MHz
Boost clock speed1746 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate279.42.376
Floating-point processing power8.94 TFLOPS0.04752 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs1604

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount16 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz396 MHz
Memory bandwidth230.4 GB/s6.336 GB/s
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P5200 31.50
+9744%
ATI HD 4250 0.32

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P5200 12135
+9847%
ATI HD 4250 122

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro P5200 65844
+28906%
ATI HD 4250 227

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD112
+11100%
1−2
−11100%
4K38-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+2600%
2−3
−2600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+2200%
3−4
−2200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60 0−1
Battlefield 5 100−110
+10300%
1−2
−10300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+3150%
2−3
−3150%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+2600%
2−3
−2600%
Far Cry 5 70−75 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+17000%
1−2
−17000%
Hitman 3 65−70
+1575%
4−5
−1575%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+1638%
8−9
−1638%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+10600%
1−2
−10600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 152
+3700%
4−5
−3700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+318%
27−30
−318%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+2200%
3−4
−2200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60 0−1
Battlefield 5 100−110
+10300%
1−2
−10300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+3150%
2−3
−3150%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+2600%
2−3
−2600%
Far Cry 5 70−75 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+17000%
1−2
−17000%
Hitman 3 65−70
+1575%
4−5
−1575%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+1638%
8−9
−1638%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+10600%
1−2
−10600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+2700%
4−5
−2700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+644%
9−10
−644%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+318%
27−30
−318%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+2200%
3−4
−2200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+3150%
2−3
−3150%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+2600%
2−3
−2600%
Far Cry 5 70−75 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+17000%
1−2
−17000%
Hitman 3 65−70
+1575%
4−5
−1575%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+1638%
8−9
−1638%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+2700%
4−5
−2700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65
+622%
9−10
−622%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+318%
27−30
−318%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 0−1
Far Cry 5 35−40 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+18200%
1−2
−18200%
Hitman 3 40−45
+567%
6−7
−567%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+3250%
2−3
−3250%
Metro Exodus 60−65 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 160−170
+16700%
1−2
−16700%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+2600%
2−3
−2600%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27 0−1
Hitman 3 24−27 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+15600%
1−2
−15600%
Metro Exodus 35−40 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Far Cry 5 18−20 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%

This is how Quadro P5200 and ATI HD 4250 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P5200 is 11100% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Quadro P5200 is 3700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Quadro P5200 surpassed ATI HD 4250 in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.50 0.32
Recency 21 February 2018 25 February 2009
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 25 Watt

Quadro P5200 has a 9743.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 243.8% more advanced lithography process.

ATI HD 4250, on the other hand, has 300% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P5200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4250 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5200 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon HD 4250 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P5200
Quadro P5200
ATI Radeon HD 4250
Radeon HD 4250

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 94 votes

Rate Quadro P5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 83 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.