GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs 8600 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8600 GT with GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

8600 GT
2007
512 MB GDDR3, 47 Watt
0.32

RTX 3080 Mobile outperforms 8600 GT by a whopping 13278% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking131391
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.4725.63
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG84GA104
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 April 2007 (17 years ago)12 January 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores326144
Core clock speed540 MHz1110 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1545 MHz
Number of transistors289 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)47 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate8.640296.6
Floating-point processing power0.07616 TFLOPS18.98 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs16192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Standard memory config per GPU256 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA1.18.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

8600 GT 0.32
RTX 3080 Mobile 42.81
+13278%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8600 GT 123
RTX 3080 Mobile 16457
+13280%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−1120
1440p0−173
4K-0−146

Cost per frame, $

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 103
+0%
103
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 134
+0%
134
+0%
Elden Ring 132
+0%
132
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 100
+0%
100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 108
+0%
108
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 261
+0%
261
+0%
Metro Exodus 108
+0%
108
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Valorant 198
+0%
198
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 86
+0%
86
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 90
+0%
90
+0%
Dota 2 132
+0%
132
+0%
Elden Ring 204
+0%
204
+0%
Far Cry 5 83
+0%
83
+0%
Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 213
+0%
213
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 131
+0%
131
+0%
Metro Exodus 91
+0%
91
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 74
+0%
74
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 111
+0%
111
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75
+0%
75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80
+0%
80
+0%
Dota 2 128
+0%
128
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 185
+0%
185
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Valorant 179
+0%
179
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 94
+0%
94
+0%
Elden Ring 111
+0%
111
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 94
+0%
94
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 49
+0%
49
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 47
+0%
47
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21
+0%
21
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 141
+0%
141
+0%
Metro Exodus 90
+0%
90
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
+0%
79
+0%
Valorant 134
+0%
134
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Dota 2 93
+0%
93
+0%
Elden Ring 57
+0%
57
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 93
+0%
93
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 32
+0%
32
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 93
+0%
93
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+0%
11
+0%
Dota 2 110
+0%
110
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 79
+0%
79
+0%
Valorant 76
+0%
76
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.32 42.81
Recency 17 April 2007 12 January 2021
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 47 Watt 115 Watt

8600 GT has 144.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 3080 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 13278.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8600 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8600 GT is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
GeForce 8600 GT
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1039 votes

Rate GeForce 8600 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 799 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.