GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs Quadro P5200

Place in the ranking	179	9
Place by popularity	not in top-100	13
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	67.32
Power efficiency	21.67	24.50
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GP104	AD104
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	21 February 2018 (6 years ago)	8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	7168
Core clock speed	1556 MHz	1980 MHz
Boost clock speed	1746 MHz	2475 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	220 Watt
Texture fill rate	279.4	554.4
Floating-point processing power	8.94 TFLOPS	35.48 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	80
TMUs	160	224
Tensor Cores	no data	224
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth	230.4 GB/s	504.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	6.1	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P5200 31.41

RTX 4070 SUPER 78.12
+149%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P5200 12077

RTX 4070 SUPER 30038
+149%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P5200 25100

RTX 4070 SUPER 68373
+172%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P5200 18467

RTX 4070 SUPER 48876
+165%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P5200 106328

RTX 4070 SUPER 171098
+60.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	114 −91.2%	218 +91.2%
1440p	55−60 −160%	143 +160%
4K	46 −87%	86 +87%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.75
1440p	no data	4.19
4K	no data	6.97

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	60−65 −200%	186 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 −146%	160−170 +146%
Elden Ring	100−110 −190%	300−350 +190%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 −28.6%	110−120 +28.6%
Counter-Strike 2	60−65 −194%	182 +194%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 −146%	160−170 +146%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −201%	434 +201%
Metro Exodus	75−80 −94.9%	150−160 +94.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 −123%	140−150 +123%
Valorant	120−130 −250%	400−450 +250%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 −28.6%	110−120 +28.6%
Counter-Strike 2	60−65 −156%	159 +156%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 −146%	160−170 +146%
Dota 2	100−110 −66.3%	173 +66.3%
Elden Ring	100−110 −190%	300−350 +190%
Far Cry 5	85−90 −74.7%	152 +74.7%
Fortnite	140−150 −110%	300−350 +110%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −197%	428 +197%
Grand Theft Auto V	100−110 −68%	173 +68%
Metro Exodus	75−80 +6.8%	74 −6.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	216 +0.5%	210−220 −0.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 −123%	140−150 +123%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−110 −64.2%	170−180 +64.2%
Valorant	120−130 −250%	400−450 +250%
World of Tanks	270−280 −1.1%	270−280 +1.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 −28.6%	110−120 +28.6%
Counter-Strike 2	60−65 −124%	139 +124%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 −146%	160−170 +146%
Dota 2	100−110 −140%	250−260 +140%
Far Cry 5	85−90 −69%	140−150 +69%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −165%	381 +165%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	84 −156%	210−220 +156%
Valorant	120−130 −250%	400−450 +250%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	55−60 −164%	148 +164%
Elden Ring	55−60 −273%	220−230 +273%
Grand Theft Auto V	55−60 −164%	148 +164%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 −210%	90−95 +210%
World of Tanks	200−210 −155%	500−550 +155%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −42.6%	85−90 +42.6%
Counter-Strike 2	27−30 −200%	87 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −141%	70−75 +141%
Far Cry 5	95−100 −63.3%	160−170 +63.3%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 −205%	265 +205%
Metro Exodus	70−75 −95.7%	130−140 +95.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −208%	154 +208%
Valorant	90−95 −305%	350−400 +305%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−33 −240%	100−110 +240%
Dota 2	55−60 −186%	166 +186%
Elden Ring	27−30 −344%	120−130 +344%
Grand Theft Auto V	55−60 −186%	166 +186%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −196%	74 +196%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	93 −125%	200−210 +125%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −220%	60−65 +220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 −186%	166 +186%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −160%	90−95 +160%
Counter-Strike 2	30−33 −240%	100−110 +240%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −125%	27−30 +125%
Dota 2	55−60 −141%	140−150 +141%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −139%	100−110 +139%
Fortnite	40−45 −134%	95−100 +134%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −164%	132 +164%
Valorant	45−50 −367%	210−220 +367%

This is how Quadro P5200 and RTX 4070 SUPER compete in popular games:

RTX 4070 SUPER is 91% faster in 1080p
RTX 4070 SUPER is 160% faster in 1440p
RTX 4070 SUPER is 87% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P5200 is 7% faster.
in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4070 SUPER is 367% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Quadro P5200 is ahead in 2 tests (4%)
RTX 4070 SUPER is ahead in 52 tests (95%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	31.41	78.12
Recency	21 February 2018	8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	220 Watt

Quadro P5200 has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 120% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 148.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P5200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5200 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.