GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile vs Quadro P5200

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Quadro P5200
2017
16 GB GDDR5
31.72

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile outperforms Quadro P5200 by 23% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking165105
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.4014.96
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameGP104N18E-G3 TU104
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date11 January 2017 (7 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price$3894 $1671

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2080 Super Mobile has 340% better value for money than Quadro P5200.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25603072
Core clock speed1316 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speed1569 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate279.4299.5

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P5200 and GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed7216 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth230.4 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC supportno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data
VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDA6.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P5200 31.72
RTX 2080 Super Mobile 39.08
+23.2%

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile outperforms Quadro P5200 by 23% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro P5200 65844
RTX 2080 Super Mobile 69838
+6.1%

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile outperforms Quadro P5200 by 6% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro P5200 25100
RTX 2080 Super Mobile 34876
+38.9%

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile outperforms Quadro P5200 by 39% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro P5200 18467
RTX 2080 Super Mobile 24960
+35.2%

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile outperforms Quadro P5200 by 35% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro P5200 106328
RTX 2080 Super Mobile 141486
+33.1%

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile outperforms Quadro P5200 by 33% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD119
−16%
138
+16%
1440p75−80
−28%
96
+28%
4K48
−35.4%
65
+35.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−27.8%
65−70
+27.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
−66.1%
98
+66.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
−21.4%
65−70
+21.4%
Battlefield 5 95−100
−72.4%
169
+72.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
−70.6%
145
+70.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−27.8%
65−70
+27.8%
Far Cry 5 80−85
−20.7%
95−100
+20.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
−45%
116
+45%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−17.8%
110−120
+17.8%
Hitman 3 95−100
−25.3%
120−130
+25.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−23.5%
80−85
+23.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−129%
117
+129%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 91
−49.5%
136
+49.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−20%
70−75
+20%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
−44.1%
85
+44.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
−21.4%
65−70
+21.4%
Battlefield 5 95−100
−64.3%
161
+64.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
−48.2%
126
+48.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−27.8%
65−70
+27.8%
Far Cry 5 80−85
−20.7%
95−100
+20.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
−41.3%
113
+41.3%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−17.8%
110−120
+17.8%
Hitman 3 95−100
−25.3%
120−130
+25.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−70.6%
116
+70.6%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−67.3%
92
+67.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−29.4%
66
+29.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 78
−65.4%
129
+65.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118
−67.8%
198
+67.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−20%
70−75
+20%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
−5.1%
62
+5.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
−21.4%
65−70
+21.4%
Battlefield 5 95−100
−50%
147
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−27.8%
65−70
+27.8%
Far Cry 5 80−85
−20.7%
95−100
+20.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
−25%
100
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−17.8%
110−120
+17.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65
−58.5%
103
+58.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−20%
70−75
+20%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−64.7%
84
+64.7%
Hitman 3 55−60
−30.4%
70−75
+30.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−86%
80
+86%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−66.7%
55
+66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−72%
43
+72%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−91.1%
86
+91.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−62.9%
57
+62.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−26.5%
40−45
+26.5%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−75.4%
121
+75.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−34.8%
30−35
+34.8%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−26.8%
70−75
+26.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−47.5%
90
+47.5%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−24.2%
80−85
+24.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−33.3%
55−60
+33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−77.8%
48
+77.8%
Hitman 3 30−35
−25.8%
35−40
+25.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−4.5%
23
+4.5%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−66.7%
35
+66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−64.7%
28
+64.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 26
−76.9%
46
+76.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
−65.2%
76
+65.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−81%
38
+81%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−31.6%
24−27
+31.6%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−89.5%
72
+89.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−44.4%
12−14
+44.4%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−32.1%
35−40
+32.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−71.9%
55
+71.9%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−25%
55−60
+25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−33.3%
20−22
+33.3%

This is how Quadro P5200 and RTX 2080 Super Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 16% faster than Quadro P5200 in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 28% faster than Quadro P5200 in 1440p
  • RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 35.4% faster than Quadro P5200 in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 129% faster than the Quadro P5200.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 2080 Super Mobile surpassed Quadro P5200 in all 68 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.72 39.08
Recency 11 January 2017 2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm

The GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P5200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5200 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P5200
Quadro P5200
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 81 vote

Rate Quadro P5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 125 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.