Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Tesla M40 vs Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Aggregated performance score
P5200 Max-Q
2018
16 GB GDDR5
31.90
+21.3%
Tesla M40
2015
12 GB GDDR5
26.29
Quadro P5200 Max-Q outperforms Tesla M40 by 21% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 161 | 189 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | no data | 75.87 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019) |
| GPU code name | GP104 | GM200 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 21 February 2018 (6 years old) | 10 November 2015 (8 years old) |
| Current price | no data | $101 |
Value for money
no data
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2560 | 3072 |
| Core clock speed | 1316 MHz | 948 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1569 MHz | 1112 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 7,200 million | 8,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 251.0 | 213.5 |
| Floating-point performance | no data | 6,844 gflops |
Size and compatibility
Information on Quadro P5200 Max-Q and Tesla M40 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 8-pin EPS |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7216 MHz | 6 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 230.9 GB/s | 288.4 GB/s |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 5.2 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Quadro P5200 Max-Q outperforms Tesla M40 by 21% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
Quadro P5200 Max-Q outperforms Tesla M40 by 21% in Passmark.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 31.90 | 26.29 |
| Recency | 21 February 2018 | 10 November 2015 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Chip lithography | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 250 Watt |
The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla M40 in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro P5200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while Tesla M40 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
